Pricefield | Lemmy
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
HLMenckenFan to politics @lemmy.worldEnglish • 2 years ago

There's no such thing as a conservative intellectual — only apologists for right-wing power

www.salon.com

external-link
message-square
121
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • [email protected]
112
external-link

There's no such thing as a conservative intellectual — only apologists for right-wing power

www.salon.com

HLMenckenFan to politics @lemmy.worldEnglish • 2 years ago
message-square
121
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • [email protected]
From Burke to Buckley to Patrick Deneen, we've seen a 200-year history of defending the indefensible
  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    0•2 years ago

    removed by mod

    • g0nz0li0
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -1•2 years ago

      Is it hateful, or just critical?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2•2 years ago

        removed by mod

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -2•2 years ago

          How’s it hateful? At least in a way that modern right wing ideology isn’t?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -2•2 years ago

      ah, there’s the victimhood the article spoke of

    • Raltoid
      link
      fedilink
      English
      3•
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      You are aware that scientific studies have shown a clear correlation between conservative thinking and lower cognitive ability?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        0•2 years ago

        removed by mod

        • Flying Squid
          link
          fedilink
          English
          0•2 years ago

          Which tobacco studies?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -1•2 years ago

            removed by mod

            • Flying Squid
              link
              fedilink
              English
              1•2 years ago

              There’s nothing there about any studies claiming tobacco was good for you. Just finding doctors to say so.

              • sadreality
                link
                fedilink
                -2•2 years ago

                Tobacco industry pkay book is used by big oil, sugar, bad food in general and now tech.

                Deny until you can’t. Fund fake studies to help your denial arguments. Talk about choice and freedom. Fear monger.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                -2•2 years ago

                removed by mod

                • Flying Squid
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  1•2 years ago

                  That article says they weren’t real studies. We’re talking about real studies here. Things that are peer-reviewed.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -1•2 years ago

          Then try finding a single study that says the opposite.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -2•2 years ago

      It’s hateful? How exactly?

      • tjhart85
        link
        fedilink
        0•2 years ago

        Well I hated it!
        --Michael Scott

        Is basically what all the arguments I’ve seen boil down to

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1•2 years ago

      This type of article is just absolute garbage

      Fucking salon Jesus Christ

politics @lemmy.world

[email protected]
Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

  • 102 users / day
  • 1.01K users / week
  • 3.24K users / month
  • 9.17K users / 6 months
  • 2 subscribers
  • 23.6K Posts
  • 614K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • outrageousmatter
  • @[email protected]
  • @[email protected]
  • 🌱 🐄🌱
  • @[email protected]
  • @[email protected]
  • Lasherz
  • UI: 0.18.4
  • BE: 0.18.2
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org