@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 1 year ago#sciencemander.xyzimagemessage-square24fedilinkarrow-up1724
arrow-up1724image#sciencemander.xyz@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 1 year agomessage-square24fedilink
minus-squareivanafteralllinkfedilink73•1 year agoRandom online scientist here to tell you: this study has deep flaws. Among them, the way it was conducted and its outcomes. This is for various technical reasons you wouldn’t really understand.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish3•1 year agoAs a random commenter, clearly the sample size is too small and they mixed up correlation and causation
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•1 year agoThe contribution to the community is weak. I recommend the authors to work on their study design and to basically redo everything in good.
Random online scientist here to tell you: this study has deep flaws. Among them, the way it was conducted and its outcomes. This is for various technical reasons you wouldn’t really understand.
You must be tenured.
As a random commenter, clearly the sample size is too small and they mixed up correlation and causation
The contribution to the community is weak. I recommend the authors to work on their study design and to basically redo everything in good.