- Browser makers Apple, Google, Microsoft, and Mozilla have announced Interop 2024, a project to promote web browser interoperability.
- JPEG XL, a potential replacement for JPEG and PNG image formats, was not included in Interop 2024.
- The rejection of JPEG XL has been blamed on Google, with the Google Chrome team deciding not to support the image compression technology.
Archive link: https://archive.ph/nulY6
Am I having a stroke, or is this headline horrendously written?
I read it four times and I still don’t understand what love-in means.
Dumb way of saying orgy.
I still don’t understand. WTF are we talking about. This is tech news, not a celeb scandal. Why can’t we just use simple words !
Why say lot word when few word do trick?
What’s the smart way?
I believe you just responded to a message with the answer to your question.
Orgy.
deleted by creator
I did decline a event because it said “Dinner Party” in quotes.
When they explained, they meant because it’s not really dinner but snacks and board games. Shame. Was expecting orgy
deleted by creator
Hahahah, upvote for including the tidbit with your PS and not making us ask.
As someone with very limited short-term/working memory, I feel your pain.
Something about love in subs for Google ? And also JPEG?
The register is doing this shit for years. They are trying to sound smart…
Horrible headline.
Chromium (used by most browsers)
doesn’t support
JPEG XL (because Google doesn’t like it)
Thank you. I legitimately could not understand the title.
It was chrome and Firefox both who were against the format, both saying too expensive to implement for too small a benefit
I think these days that’s the rule, if it piques your interest but you have some trouble understanding headline, you may just click on the article