English Kings named Charles and dying due to their own stubbornness - name a better duo.

  • Saeculum [he/him, comrade/them]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    51 year ago

    I have family that got cancer around 75, had chemo and lived another 15 years, and that was treatment on the NHS, not the best care money can buy.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 year ago

      Absolutely an edge case and not typical of anyone’s experience. Several of my family members are dead after painful chemo in their 50s

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          I simply do not believe that first statistic that you googled from a Finnish study. 80 is over the median age of most people. Now if you are King Charles and you are probably going to die in 5 - 10 years anyway do you want to spend your last 5 years extremely sick getting poisoned by chemo or do you want to spend it doped up on drugs having everything you can possibly want while you get to be the king you waited for 75 years to be then meet the inevitable anyway?

          • Saeculum [he/him, comrade/them]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            80 is over the median age of most people

            Sure, but if you make it to 75, you are considerably more likely to make it to 80 than the median person.

            The median person also does not have parents that each made it to their late 90s, or access to the world’s best medicine.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 year ago

              And you really think someone who has the best medicine in the would choose to not treat because they are dumb dumbs or because they probably know its useless to treat? If I were him I wouldn’t take chemo either after watching what it did to my sister in her 50s.

              • Saeculum [he/him, comrade/them]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                11 year ago

                And you really think someone who has the best medicine in the would choose to not treat because they are dumb dumbs

                Yes. Look at Steve Jobs, plenty of people refuse treatment for easily curable diseases. Being rich and powerful does not stop you from being a moron.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  1
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  I don’t think you know the whole story and you think you know what happens inside peoples heads. Steve jobs had pancreatic cancer with a 5 year survival rate of 10% for eight years, he already beat the odds. He had a kind of cancer computer fabricators got in the 70s and ravaged grey beard engineers across silicon valley.

                  You really have no idea what you are talking about, what it is like to be sick and what chemo does to you. It is their right not to seek treatment and to go out with dignity if that is their decision and that doesn’t make them a moron.

                  • Saeculum [he/him, comrade/them]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    11 year ago

                    Steve jobs had pancreatic cancer with a 5 year survival rate of 10%

                    Steve Jobs has a neuro-endocrine tumor that was diagnosis before metastasis occured. This had a 5-year survival rate of 93% at the time of his diagnosis.

                    Removal of the tumour would have been a relatively routine and low risk surgery, which would have vastly increased his chance of survival, but he waited nine months to pursue treatment, trying to cure it himself with veganism and acupuncture.

                    he already beat the odds.

                    He could be alive today if he’d listened to his doctors and family.