Sounds like a strawman argument to me. This was passed years ago yet nothing has actually changed. It’s meaningless. If you can show me empirical evidence that demonstrates real reform then show me, otherwise your words are as meaningless as this “act”.
Your point was that a thing which you claim passed did not in fact pass? And I proved that? Clearly I’m arguing with an addict of some sort, hope you get that sorted out.
If that’s true then clearly you don’t have the reading comprehension to understand it even if it were explained to you.
Sounds like a strawman argument to me. This was passed years ago yet nothing has actually changed. It’s meaningless. If you can show me empirical evidence that demonstrates real reform then show me, otherwise your words are as meaningless as this “act”.
You have no argument.
It never passed. It went through the house and never passed in the senate. Idiot.
Thanks for proving my point. ROFL.
Way to go slugger.
Your point was that a thing which you claim passed did not in fact pass? And I proved that? Clearly I’m arguing with an addict of some sort, hope you get that sorted out.
Nope. My point is that regardless of who is in office there is no financial reform. It’s the same bullshit regardless of which party is in office.
The fact that it wasn’t passed just echos my point. No one in power is interested in real reform. It’s rich vs poor and congress is on the rich side.
It’s clear you’re too daft to understand that.