• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    51 year ago

    He leaked private information of an individual. People are bending over backwards to say how in this case being against privacy is actually good

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      211 year ago

      How much privacy is expected of the POTUS? Precedent is established and in the case of the Presidency strictly adhered to until as of recently. Nah, the public was given what was owed to it.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          61 year ago

          Yeah, because the cunt doesn’t give a shit about serving the people he’s supposed to represent. Or do you also think Hitler was entitled to some privacy and the enigma code shouldn’t have been broken?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            11 year ago

            Hitler would deserve privacy if he were a United States private citizen. He was not, he was a foreign leader.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              3
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              See no he doesn’t if he’s a public official. The task of governing a large population requires transparency. I can’t believe that you argue in good faith that either a murdering fascist or a two bit con from New York deserves access to privacy while handling the affairs of multiple millions of people. Privacy laws do not apply to heads of state. You’re still arguing that these people should be able to avoid accountability for very real crimes.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                11 year ago

                There’s still a right to privacy even if you do a job of public servant, unless the law specifically requires the release of those documents.

                Even a real criminal has a right to privacy, you don’t lose all your rights when you commit a crime

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      171 year ago

      Because there are very few rules that should be universal. “Keeping tax returns secret so they don’t expose the benefits rich people get” isn’t one of them.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            1
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Yes, from the comments I see sentiments like the rich and Trump fans are not people. Just dehumanize your opponents and everything is permissible.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              71 year ago

              They are people. They’ve simply forgotten that we are people too, equal to them in every way except the size of our bank accounts.

              As for the Trump supporters, I understand why they supported him in 2016. I struggle to see why they still do after what he’s done since, ie: lowered taxes for the rich again.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              31 year ago

              Not dehumanizing them, taking away their private citizen status, because it’s right in the title “Public Official”.