• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    121 year ago

    Love reading the tankies in this thread just salivating at the chance to claim it’s not actually real

      • BraveSirZaphod
        link
        fedilink
        61 year ago

        The difference between your average liberal and a tankie is that liberals will openly say that there were no WMDs in Iraq and that the invasion was a mistake.

        Find a tankie that would ever actually criticize the CCP the same way.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          18
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          They only say that because enough time has passed. When it was current they were all on board and were calling everyone who disagreed ‘Saddam Lovers’. Just like how in 20 years they’ll all be saying that they never believed the Uyghur genocides claims, but how dare those tankies doubt [insert current atrocity propaganda here]!

          • BraveSirZaphod
            link
            fedilink
            6
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            The Iraq War inspired mass protests immediately that set records in several American cities, but sure.

            You are correct though that the narrative has shifted with time. So I take it that this has also happened in China, such that someone could organize a protest on the Tiananmen anniversary, right?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              151 year ago

              Tiananmen

              What a desperate attempt to change the topic.

              Also, just realized that you said that the invasion was a ‘mistake’, not a deliberate lie. Is there a single accusation that the West has leveled against its enemies that you don’t automatically believe?

              • BraveSirZaphod
                link
                fedilink
                41 year ago

                I mean, yes, Bush lied to the American public. This is not particularly controversial.

                And given that the original point was the difference between the ability and willingness of liberals to criticize our own governments relative to tankies, Tiananmen is a perfectly relevant topic, though I’m hardly surprised that you’d clearly like to avoid it. And if randomly bringing up supposedly unrelated topics is something to avoid, might I ask why you brought up WMDs in Iraq in a thread about the Uyghers in the first place?

                • Arthur Besse
                  link
                  fedilink
                  8
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  might I ask why you brought up WMDs in Iraq in a thread about the Uyghers in the first place

                  Sir, this is a wendy’s (checks title) thread about the ongoing genocide that Israel is perpetrating in Gaza

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  111 year ago

                  I mean, yes, Bush lied to the American public. This is not particularly controversial.

                  It was at the time. And there are still liberals who disagree

                  Tiananmen

                  Nope, not doing it. This conversation is specifically about the Uyghur genocide conspiracy theory.

                  • BraveSirZaphod
                    link
                    fedilink
                    41 year ago

                    This conversation is specifically about the Uyghur genocide conspiracy theory.

                    Weird, I thought it was about Iraq!

                    The fact that the Iraqi invasion was deeply controversial at the time, and this controversy was able to be loudly expressed, stands in very stark contrast to how controversial topics in China’s recent history can be discussed. This is the main point I’m trying to make. I see you follow the lead of the Chinese government by simply refusing to discuss it, and I understand that talking about things that challenge your world view can be uncomfortable, so I’ll do you a favor by allowing this conversation to end.

                    I would just point out, though, that if I had responded to your initial comment about WMDs in Iraq with “Nope, not doing it,” you’d probably call me a coward or something.

        • The difference between your average liberal and a tankie is that liberals will openly say that there were no WMDs in Iraq and that the invasion was a mistake.

          But liberals will still fall in line and support the current war as they always do, only after the fact they reasses their position.

          Find a tankie that would ever actually criticize the CCP the same way.

          I didn’t know the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation were a tankie group. Does that mean all Muslims are tankies?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      7
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The biggest problem is the number likely being exaggerated.

      The real amount of Uyghurs in concentration camps is completely unknown but guestimated around 30.000 to 100.000.

      The 1 million number is by a single source called Radio Free Asia which does not offer any evidence.

      The American way to spread propaganda is to take something that is true, and then heavily exaggerate it without providing evidence for the most extreme claims.

      A good video on the Uyghur Genocide here

    • carl_marks[use name]
      link
      fedilink
      201 year ago

      Love reading the radlibs in this thread just coping with nothing substantial to say when their views are challanged

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        Just shitty mods that delete anyone that dares to call out the fucking tankies infesting this thread. But ya no corporate censorship at least 🙄

        Fuck china btw