@[email protected] to [email protected] • 2 years agoGun control laws in California and beyond in peril as Supreme Court expands 2nd Amendmentwww.latimes.comexternal-linkmessage-square70fedilinkarrow-up186
arrow-up181external-linkGun control laws in California and beyond in peril as Supreme Court expands 2nd Amendmentwww.latimes.com@[email protected] to [email protected] • 2 years agomessage-square70fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink-2•2 years agoI expect nothing less from this corrupt court.
minus-squareMasterOBee Master/Kinglinkfedilink7•2 years agoJust because they don’t rule the way you’d like, doesn’t make them corrupt. What’s the cases they’ve ruled on that show you their corruption?
minus-squareDave Heidtlinkfedilink1•2 years ago@MasterObee @MyOpinion Citizens United is but one example. The shadow docket is another.
minus-squareMasterOBee Master/Kinglinkfedilink2•2 years agoCitizens united is a good example. Where do you think they got their law wrong?
minus-squareMasterOBee Master/Kinglinkfedilink3•2 years agoYeah, they interpret it. You said they got it wrong and it was a corrupt ruling. I’m curious where you think the law went against what they ruled, in other words, how did they interpret the law ‘corruptly’
minus-squareMasterOBee Master/Kinglinkfedilink1•2 years agoI don’t find your argument convincing if you can’t find any ‘corrupt’ court cases then.
minus-squareDave Heidtlinkfedilink0•2 years ago@MasterObee You’re an agent provocateur. No need to convince you. You don’t hold your own opinion on anything.
I expect nothing less from this corrupt court.
Just because they don’t rule the way you’d like, doesn’t make them corrupt.
What’s the cases they’ve ruled on that show you their corruption?
@MasterObee @MyOpinion Citizens United is but one example. The shadow docket is another.
Citizens united is a good example. Where do you think they got their law wrong?
@MasterObee Trick question. Courts don’t write laws.
Yeah, they interpret it.
You said they got it wrong and it was a corrupt ruling. I’m curious where you think the law went against what they ruled, in other words, how did they interpret the law ‘corruptly’
@MasterObee No.
I don’t find your argument convincing if you can’t find any ‘corrupt’ court cases then.
@MasterObee You’re an agent provocateur. No need to convince you. You don’t hold your own opinion on anything.