• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    91 year ago

    And this person talks about the upballot when the subject matter was downballot. He wasn’t able to answer how is Cornell West or Jill Stein relevant when it comes to downballot choices of people who refuses to vote for Biden.

    • originalucifer
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      prolly just ignoring the irrelevancy of the downballot in the face of losing democracy altogether.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        41 year ago

        You’re going to need to explain that.

        I offered an alternative to voting against Democrats, and that is the primary, and that means picking the downballot that has the most chances along with ones that aligns with ones’ view the best. You weren’t the person I responded to. And then, you decided to talk about the upballot instead. And the subject matter of the alternative wasn’t really anything to do with the upballot, and you’re not able to give a sastisfactory answer as to how they’re relevant to this proposal.

        • HACKthePRISONS
          link
          fedilink
          31 year ago

          >I offered an alternative to voting against Democrats, and that is the primary,

          and i said “no”.

        • HACKthePRISONS
          link
          fedilink
          31 year ago

          poisoning the well is a form of ad hominem where you say (or imply) that someone’s arguments are unsound because of something else they have said or done. it’s prima facie ad hominem because you are attacking the person, not the argument.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            31 year ago

            The argument you provided weren’t arguments because they didn’t align with the subject proposal at hand which is downballot choices. You came with the upballot. That’s not an argument to begin with. And I was making a observation of your responses.

            • HACKthePRISONS
              link
              fedilink
              21 year ago

              anyone can see exactly what happened and that you are just trying to imply that i was involved in some conversation that i never was.

        • HACKthePRISONS
          link
          fedilink
          21 year ago

          >And then, you decided to talk about the upballot instead.

          i never talked about the downballot at all. anyone can see exactly what i quoted, and what i said, and that i’m not getting dragged along into voting for even more democrats.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            31 year ago

            Of course you didn’t. But you responded with upballot instead when the subject matter of the proposal of alternative was to look for downballot. Do I have to repeat that until you get it?