• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    741 year ago

    I really like how people try to censor names and fail to do so. If you really want something like that to be irreversible put a fucking black rectangle instead.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      45
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Ah but that’s hard to do on a phone and you know nobody uses computers anymore. Just scribble over it with your finger, like a toddler in Kindergarten. Good enough!

      • Echo Dot
        link
        fedilink
        231 year ago

        There’s literally apps for redacting screenshots.

        The best one I’ve seen is where people scribble over it but it’s in a slightly transparent color so you can still easily read the text underneath. I can only assume that they were in a very bright environment because otherwise it’s blindingly obvious.

        • I Cast Fist
          link
          fedilink
          161 year ago

          You really expect people to download an entire app for a single image editing functionality, when the builtin gallery does “enough”?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      111 year ago

      I think they did a pretty decent job censoring those names? I can’t figure out any of them and I really tried, tbh.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        6
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Putting three instances of names as layers on top of each other with transparency effect already uncovers a large part of the most common name there, so I definitely disagree.

        If you know the exact typeface and font size used, you can just try to put letters top of the image to guess them as well (so you try to match parts of the letter with one exact character to be precise). And I am pretty sure there are some tools that make this even easier (or at least made internally by some U.S. security agencies :) ).

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          71 year ago

          I mean… ain’t nobody got time for that? But I got your points.

          If it’s a classified documents, then it’s a horrible job. But for an internet shit post, it’s decent.

          You can even argue that with generative AI, it could figured the name in mere milliseconds. But then again, for a internet shit post, ain’t nobody got time for that?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        61 year ago

        I don’t know. Maybe select rectangle tool, or big pen with no transparency effect? How am I supposed to know exactly, I probably use different phone than yours, which has different set of built-in tools.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      201 year ago

      If it was posted publicly, then you can just search for it. The globe icon tells you that the post is public.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        4
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Sure, but user can always remove their message and don’t want others to know they wrote that. And yes, I know that if you put something on the internet, you should be aware that it may never disappear, but publicly displaying regular people’s names on different website with context is a big no-no in my opinion. Also in EU there’s a right to be forgotten, and while I am not sure about exact details (I am not a lawyer), this might be illegal here as well.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      There are enough rare phonemes that you can easily find this from any search engine even if the names are blacked out completely.