My buddy, I don’t give a flying shit about shitty US law technicalities. I know you’re clutching that straw for your dear life, and I’m sure you’ll find another, when it’s time.
A person is a rapist, if he raped someone.
If you shoot someone, but don’t get caught, you’re still a murderer.
That’s about enough arguing I can take with a person who does some incredible mental gymnastics in attempt to defend a rapist.
civil only needs a preponderance of evidence. criminal requires beyond a reasonable doubt. but even that isn’t high enough, in my opinion, to justify the government taking away peoples’ freedom.
Worse. It was a finding of fact. It’s a fact that Trump is a rapist.
You can talk like you’re authoritative on the subject all you want, but that’s no where near true. Dude probably is, but proven? Nowhere near.
“You can talk like you’re authoritative on the subject…”
Talks like they’re authoritative on the subject without providing a single shred of backup.
🤌
Knowing what “convicted” means is a pretty high bar to aspire to, I know, but keep at it, you’ll get it eventually.
“Decades ago, the now President of the United States raped me.” - E. Jean Carroll
https://www.cnbc.com/2024/03/10/trump-denies-carrolls-claims-after-posting-91point6-million-bond-.html You guys aren’t nearly as clever as you think,
removed by mod
You still haven’t figured out what convicted means.
My buddy, I don’t give a flying shit about shitty US law technicalities. I know you’re clutching that straw for your dear life, and I’m sure you’ll find another, when it’s time.
A person is a rapist, if he raped someone.
If you shoot someone, but don’t get caught, you’re still a murderer.
That’s about enough arguing I can take with a person who does some incredible mental gymnastics in attempt to defend a rapist.
civil only needs a preponderance of evidence. criminal requires beyond a reasonable doubt. but even that isn’t high enough, in my opinion, to justify the government taking away peoples’ freedom.