@[email protected] to Programmer [email protected]English • 1 year agoSolutions? Where we're going, we don't need solutions.lemmy.worldimagemessage-square200fedilinkarrow-up11.15K
arrow-up11.15KimageSolutions? Where we're going, we don't need solutions.lemmy.world@[email protected] to Programmer [email protected]English • 1 year agomessage-square200fedilink
Please dont take this seriously guys its just a dumb meme I haven’t written a single line of code in half of these languages
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish27•edit-21 year agoC: Problem → return Solution; C++: Problem → const [auto]&& (Problem&& problem) noexcept(noexcept( Solution<Problem>{}(std::forward<Problem>(problem)) )) { return Solution<Problem>{}(std::forward<Problem>(problem)); } -> decltype( Solution<Problem>{}(std::forward<Problem>(problem)) )
minus-squareVenia SilentelinkfedilinkEnglish5•1 year agoBut this doesn’t return the Solution. You don’t invoke the lambda. (Or does C++ have implied returns now? Last I heard there was implied move)
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish2•1 year agoActually I do; it’s the {} that initializes the lambda, and the parenthesis after invokes. That said, it would have been fun.
C:
Problem→return Solution;C++:
Problem→C:
Maximum optimization!
But this doesn’t return the
Solution. You don’t invoke the lambda.(Or does C++ have implied returns now? Last I heard there was implied
move)Actually I do; it’s the
{}that initializes the lambda, and the parenthesis after invokes.That said, it would have been fun.