Nutomic to [email protected] • 1 year agoAnnouncing Ibis, the federated Wikipedia Alternativeibis.wikimessage-square299fedilinkarrow-up1511cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected]
arrow-up1511external-linkAnnouncing Ibis, the federated Wikipedia Alternativeibis.wikiNutomic to [email protected] • 1 year agomessage-square299fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected]
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink2•1 year agoI’ve never had issues with Wikipedia not at least mentioning a controversy on a topic if one exists. Got any current examples?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink2•1 year ago I’ve never had issues with Wikipedia not at least mentioning a controversy on a topic if one exists. How would you know?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink2•1 year agoNever heard of any examples and certainly no one has provided any in this thread. Just been the usual muh western website is evil by default kind of stuff.
I’ve never had issues with Wikipedia not at least mentioning a controversy on a topic if one exists. Got any current examples?
How would you know?
Never heard of any examples and certainly no one has provided any in this thread. Just been the usual muh western website is evil by default kind of stuff.