@[email protected] to [email protected] • 1 year agoStarbucks accused of violating Americans with Disabilities Act by charging extra for non-dairywww.kiro7.commessage-square258fedilinkarrow-up1603
arrow-up1603external-linkStarbucks accused of violating Americans with Disabilities Act by charging extra for non-dairywww.kiro7.com@[email protected] to [email protected] • 1 year agomessage-square258fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish17•1 year agoCould someone with lactose intolerance not merely omit the milk?
minus-squarestrawberrylinkfedilink5•1 year agoI mean that limits you to just straight black. no latte, cappuccino, nothing not against black coffee, but that’s not why people go to starbies
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink2•1 year agoI mean, this could apply very easily to a steakhouse too and vegetarians. Vegetarians would be limited to just salads and sides, but those aren’t why people go to a steakhouse.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish16•1 year agoThat would be an actual reasonable accommodation in this case.
Could someone with lactose intolerance not merely omit the milk?
I mean that limits you to just straight black. no latte, cappuccino, nothing
not against black coffee, but that’s not why people go to starbies
I mean, this could apply very easily to a steakhouse too and vegetarians. Vegetarians would be limited to just salads and sides, but those aren’t why people go to a steakhouse.
That would be an actual reasonable accommodation in this case.