@[email protected] to Political [email protected]English • 1 year agoJust a little friendly compromise, what could go wrong?lemmy.worldimagemessage-square200fedilinkarrow-up1679
arrow-up1679imageJust a little friendly compromise, what could go wrong?lemmy.world@[email protected] to Political [email protected]English • 1 year agomessage-square200fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish6•1 year agoSurviving a gunshot does not mean that you were not shot in a place that could have been fatal. You’re literally describing Survivorship Bias
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•1 year agoYou were going to kill them regardless, why tf do you care if the other places you shoot them have a chance of fatality? Minimizing harm is all about reducing chances of undue death or suffering.
Surviving a gunshot does not mean that you were not shot in a place that could have been fatal. You’re literally describing Survivorship Bias
You were going to kill them regardless, why tf do you care if the other places you shoot them have a chance of fatality? Minimizing harm is all about reducing chances of undue death or suffering.