Oh no! You’re right. How dare I use a dictionary of all things to define words? What was I thinking. Of course your superior intellect could easily see through my charade. Whatever would we do without you around to point out our mistakes?
Genera are within families, not the other way around. Maybe read a book?
Also: the genus Panthera consists of 5 big cats. The other two big cats that aren’t in Panthera are the cougar, which is also colloquially called a panther, and the cheetah.
So, in fact, “panther” can refer to any big cat other than cheetahs.
removed by mod
Got a link?
removed by mod
Imagine arguing nomenclature and being this much of a dick about it
No. Wrong again. FFS. Do your research. Panthers are “a large wild cat, especially a leopard or jaguar, in a color form with black fur”
removed by mod
What about https://wikipedia.org/wiki/Pantera
Oh no! You’re right. How dare I use a dictionary of all things to define words? What was I thinking. Of course your superior intellect could easily see through my charade. Whatever would we do without you around to point out our mistakes?
Shut up.
Are you being an asshole about it? Oh wait I don’t need to look it up lol
removed by mod
This implies that it’s more common for black furred leapords and jaguars to be called panthers, but other things can be called panthers too.
removed by mod
Genera are within families, not the other way around. Maybe read a book?
Also: the genus Panthera consists of 5 big cats. The other two big cats that aren’t in Panthera are the cougar, which is also colloquially called a panther, and the cheetah.
So, in fact, “panther” can refer to any big cat other than cheetahs.
Dude, you clearly know nothing about taxonomy or big cats. You just want to be pedantic, but you are flat out wrong
Isn’t the “especially” part an injection which could be left out, so essentially: “A panther is a large wild cat, […], with black fur”?