@[email protected] to politics @lemmy.world • 1 year agoDemocrats who attack the rich do better in elections. The party should take noticewww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square120fedilinkarrow-up1979
arrow-up1979external-linkDemocrats who attack the rich do better in elections. The party should take noticewww.theguardian.com@[email protected] to politics @lemmy.world • 1 year agomessage-square120fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish2•1 year ago“That which can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.” Where is the evidence to the contrary? That was the original assertion.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink2•1 year agoNo, it wasn’t. I asked for evidence for a claim. You didn’t give one.
“That which can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.”
Where is the evidence to the contrary? That was the original assertion.
No, it wasn’t.
I asked for evidence for a claim. You didn’t give one.