Pricefield | Lemmy
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
ProdigalFrog to [email protected]English • 1 year ago

The WHO declared aspartame "possibly" causes cancer. Here’s what that means. | Vox

www.vox.com

external-link
message-square
99
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
215
external-link

The WHO declared aspartame "possibly" causes cancer. Here’s what that means. | Vox

www.vox.com

ProdigalFrog to [email protected]English • 1 year ago
message-square
99
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
The WHO declared aspartame "possibly" causes cancer. Here’s what that means.
www.vox.com
external-link
Get ready for an earful about the health risks of Diet Coke, Trident gum, Equal, and other sugar-free items.
  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    19•
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Let’s trade sources. Here are mine.

    • Secondhand smoking may increase the overall risk of cancer for never smokers, particularly lung and breast cancer, and especially in women.

    • Does secondhand smoke cause cancer? Yes. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, the U.S. National Toxicology Program, the U.S. Surgeon General, and the International Agency for Research on Cancer have all classified secondhand smoke as a known human carcinogen (a cancer-causing agent) (1, 3, 7, 9)

    • Twenty years after secondhand smoke was first classified as a cause of lung cancer in lifetime nonsmokers, the evidence supporting causation continues to mount (USDHHS 1986).

    • Exposure to environmental tobacco smoke among nonsmokers increases lung cancer risk by about 20 percent. Secondhand smoke is estimated to cause approximately 53,800 deaths annually in the United States. Exposure to tobacco smoke in the home is also a risk factor for asthma in children.

    Edit: I also did the work for you and checked some of the references in those sources. Here’s the 1986 landmark surgeon general report.

    • Melkath
      link
      fedilink
      2•1 year ago

      removed by mod

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        2•1 year ago

        All of these studies are extensively peer reviewed. What source do you have that proves they are unreliable? Let’s pretend that it’s true, what purpose is served by fabricating this data?

[email protected]

[email protected]
Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

  • 2 users / day
  • 1 user / week
  • 519 users / month
  • 2.15K users / 6 months
  • 3 subscribers
  • 2.23K Posts
  • 20.6K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • m3t00🌎
  • @[email protected]
  • @[email protected]
  • @[email protected]
  • laverabe
  • UI: 0.18.4
  • BE: 0.18.2
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org