Yuritopiaposadism [none/use name] to [email protected]English • 1 year agoLike that’s not even a design. That’s an actual human. A GORGEOUS human woman. And they’re like “nah this isn’t sexy enough”hexbear.netimagemessage-square93fedilinkarrow-up1150
arrow-up1150imageLike that’s not even a design. That’s an actual human. A GORGEOUS human woman. And they’re like “nah this isn’t sexy enough”hexbear.netYuritopiaposadism [none/use name] to [email protected]English • 1 year agomessage-square93fedilink
minus-squareGreenleaf [he/him]linkfedilinkEnglish11•edit-21 year agoI genuinely learned something through this. Gendered character selection always seemed off to me but I couldn’t quite articulate why until I read this.
minus-squareDirt_Owl [comrade/them, they/them]linkfedilinkEnglish16•edit-21 year agoIt’s not even that it’s gendered, it’s that it’s the only way that gender is allowed to be But thanks, I’m glad I didn’t sound too unhinged
I genuinely learned something through this. Gendered character selection always seemed off to me but I couldn’t quite articulate why until I read this.
It’s not even that it’s gendered, it’s that it’s the only way that gender is allowed to be
But thanks, I’m glad I didn’t sound too unhinged