@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 1 year agoSupreme leader madsh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square103fedilinkarrow-up1764
arrow-up1764imageSupreme leader madsh.itjust.works@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 1 year agomessage-square103fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish17•1 year agoLots of core UNIX and Linux projects are. C++ is not liked by a lot of low level FOSS community. I think Rust is going to get further into these areas. I know C++ well but prefer C. I know plenty of others who feel the same.
minus-squaredoriancodeslinkfedilink3•1 year agoI’ve read that they are writing parts of the kernel in Rust
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish4•1 year agoYes, I think Rust is a better C++ and will replace it in many places. Though all three will be around for ever to be honest.
minus-square@[email protected]OPlinkfedilinkEnglish2•1 year agoYes, first Rust code was released in 6.6 I think and MS also started implementing Rust code in the Windows kernel.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish3•1 year agoRust is certainly interesting. I think it’s the C++ we need.
Lots of core UNIX and Linux projects are. C++ is not liked by a lot of low level FOSS community. I think Rust is going to get further into these areas. I know C++ well but prefer C. I know plenty of others who feel the same.
I’ve read that they are writing parts of the kernel in Rust
Yes, I think Rust is a better C++ and will replace it in many places. Though all three will be around for ever to be honest.
Yes, first Rust code was released in 6.6 I think and MS also started implementing Rust code in the Windows kernel.
Rust is certainly interesting. I think it’s the C++ we need.
Exactly my thoughts 👍.
Personally I find the syntax unreadable.