Lanky_Pomegranate530M to The Right Can't [email protected] • 1 year agoOk? Still prochoice.midwest.socialimagemessage-square32fedilinkarrow-up1124
arrow-up1124imageOk? Still prochoice.midwest.socialLanky_Pomegranate530M to The Right Can't [email protected] • 1 year agomessage-square32fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink9•1 year agoIt kinda is, because the reduced risk they’re referring to is due to fewer menstrual cycles (while carrying the pregnancy). But you can get the same benefit from hormonal birth control
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink3•1 year agoI was referring specifically to the reduced risk of ovarian and breast cancers.
minus-squareLemminarylinkfedilink1•edit-21 year agoYeah, I wasn’t. Giving birth is not a requirement for any of these things.
minus-squareLemminarylinkfedilink2•1 year agoI was mainly thinking about the second half of the post about babies’ stem cells. The research was done on the blood of pregnant women.
It kinda is, because the reduced risk they’re referring to is due to fewer menstrual cycles (while carrying the pregnancy). But you can get the same benefit from hormonal birth control
deleted by creator
I was referring specifically to the reduced risk of ovarian and breast cancers.
Yeah, I wasn’t. Giving birth is not a requirement for any of these things.
I was mainly thinking about the second half of the post about babies’ stem cells. The research was done on the blood of pregnant women.