@[email protected] to [email protected] • 1 year agoNimbys v Yimbys: the affluent inner Melbourne suburbs that aren’t pulling their weight on housingwww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square13fedilinkarrow-up122
arrow-up122external-linkNimbys v Yimbys: the affluent inner Melbourne suburbs that aren’t pulling their weight on housingwww.theguardian.com@[email protected] to [email protected] • 1 year agomessage-square13fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink7•1 year agoAnyone with a tennis court should be forced to subdivide, and get no compensation.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink3•1 year agoThat’s a bit rough isn’t it? Why tennis courts specifically and not people with gardens? or Pools? Is it just that anyone who has a tennis court is therefore rich and won’t notice the financial loss?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink6•edit-21 year agoI’ve seen a pool fit in a subdivided lot. Gardens have use. A tennis court is a bullshit vanity.
Anyone with a tennis court should be forced to subdivide, and get no compensation.
That’s a bit rough isn’t it? Why tennis courts specifically and not people with gardens? or Pools? Is it just that anyone who has a tennis court is therefore rich and won’t notice the financial loss?
Yes.
I’ve seen a pool fit in a subdivided lot. Gardens have use. A tennis court is a bullshit vanity.