@[email protected] to Science [email protected]English • 1 year agoOr we could do metric timefiles.catbox.moeimagemessage-square201fedilinkarrow-up1945
arrow-up1945imageOr we could do metric timefiles.catbox.moe@[email protected] to Science [email protected]English • 1 year agomessage-square201fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish9•1 year agoYes, but having 2, 3, 4, 6 as factors is way better than having only 2 and 5. We’d be giving up one factor to add three.
minus-squareKaityylinkfedilinkEnglish7•1 year agoBig Decimal has brainwashed the population into thinking that 5 is a good number instead of the terrible prime number that it is. It should be clumped in with 7 and 11 as Bad Numbers when you’re dealing with anything except for 10s.
But not for 1/5
Yes, but having 2, 3, 4, 6 as factors is way better than having only 2 and 5. We’d be giving up one factor to add three.
Big Decimal has brainwashed the population into thinking that 5 is a good number instead of the terrible prime number that it is. It should be clumped in with 7 and 11 as Bad Numbers when you’re dealing with anything except for 10s.