• @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      Who actually cares what you call it? The point is, you remove whatever money they got from being shitty, and then hit them with a fine.

      Do you think 10% on top of the “refund” is not enough? I think that’s got more teeth than any fines we use today. I can get behind it not being a steep enough penalty, but say that, instead of arguing over “refund” versus “fine” and “earnings” versus “acquisitions” or whatever terminology bugbear you have.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        And here in lies the problem.

        You conflate earnings from fraud, still. Fines are a deterent, a burden with the goal to stop the behaviour. 10% of a few sales even a million dollars revenue is still very little for a company this size.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          11 year ago

          Okay so you take issue with the 10% part. We can talk about that, for sure. I think 10% is low too. But you’re attacking me as if I’m thinking it’s all well and good they’re doing this shit. It’s not. We’re on the same page philosophically, you just really don’t like the specific terminology I’m using, and would rather argue than try to get to a common ground. Take care, bud.