You said “imagine doing a thing” implying it was a really dumb idea… Like imagine eating a tidepod… Crazy right?
But it was “imagine using a android” which like 70% of the world uses… Now your implying 70% of the world is doing something so dumb it is surprising you.
People sensibly ask you, what should they be using instead if they care about freedom etc, and your reply is use something that doesn’t exist yet…
So now the full circle is imagine doing a thing, crazy! , you should really be using something that doesn’t exist yet… You created a rhetorical situation thats impossible, and that’s why people respond very negatively to you. Your logic is inconsistent.
I haven’t been rude to you. Or at least I don’t think I have been.
I explained everything as clearly as I could.
Remember with communication, it’s not your intent it’s the perception that’s important. And yes your initial phrase came off as hostile and condescending
deleted by creator
You said “imagine doing a thing” implying it was a really dumb idea… Like imagine eating a tidepod… Crazy right?
But it was “imagine using a android” which like 70% of the world uses… Now your implying 70% of the world is doing something so dumb it is surprising you.
People sensibly ask you, what should they be using instead if they care about freedom etc, and your reply is use something that doesn’t exist yet…
So now the full circle is imagine doing a thing, crazy! , you should really be using something that doesn’t exist yet… You created a rhetorical situation thats impossible, and that’s why people respond very negatively to you. Your logic is inconsistent.
deleted by creator
I haven’t been rude to you. Or at least I don’t think I have been.
I explained everything as clearly as I could.
Remember with communication, it’s not your intent it’s the perception that’s important. And yes your initial phrase came off as hostile and condescending