defunct_punk to Lemmy [email protected]English • 1 year agoCumlemmy.worldimagemessage-square30fedilinkarrow-up1397
arrow-up1397imageCumlemmy.worlddefunct_punk to Lemmy [email protected]English • 1 year agomessage-square30fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink12•1 year agoI though it was post hoc, ergo propter hoc? After the fact, therefore because of the fact?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink3•edit-21 year agoYeah, that’s what I mean. The person I was responding to was comparing it to cum hoc which means that the two events being considered simultaneously, which I don’t think is correct.
I though it was post hoc, ergo propter hoc? After the fact, therefore because of the fact?
Yeah, that’s what I mean.
The person I was responding to was comparing it to cum hoc which means that the two events being considered simultaneously, which I don’t think is correct.
deleted by creator