LaGG_3 [he/him, comrade/them] to [email protected]English • 1 year agoAustralia’s richest woman seeks removal of her portrait from exhibitionwww.cnn.comexternal-linkmessage-square14fedilinkarrow-up161cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up161external-linkAustralia’s richest woman seeks removal of her portrait from exhibitionwww.cnn.comLaGG_3 [he/him, comrade/them] to [email protected]English • 1 year agomessage-square14fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareFeinsteins_Ghost [he/him]linkfedilinkEnglish12•1 year agoIm of two minds. Leave it up because it causes some rich asshole even the slightest bit of discomfort. But also, take it down because its a painting of a rich POS who doesnt deserve to have a canvas used in her image, however distorted it may be. But i dont know shit about anything so
minus-squareInfamousblt [any]linkfedilinkEnglish14•1 year agoTake it down unless she doesn’t want it up, in which case, leave it up to annoy her. So definitely leave it up
minus-squareFeinsteins_Ghost [he/him]linkfedilinkEnglish7•1 year agoYeah, thats it. Whichever option pisses her off the most is the right one.
minus-squareLaGG_3 [he/him, comrade/them]OPlinkfedilinkEnglish21•1 year agoMaking rich people upset is almost always good and funny imo
Im of two minds. Leave it up because it causes some rich asshole even the slightest bit of discomfort.
But also, take it down because its a painting of a rich POS who doesnt deserve to have a canvas used in her image, however distorted it may be.
But i dont know shit about anything so
Take it down unless she doesn’t want it up, in which case, leave it up to annoy her. So definitely leave it up
Yeah, thats it. Whichever option pisses her off the most is the right one.
Making rich people upset is almost always good and funny imo