@[email protected] to Lemmy [email protected] • 1 year agoNon-binarylemmy.worldimagemessage-square211fedilinkarrow-up11.43K
arrow-up11.43KimageNon-binarylemmy.world@[email protected] to Lemmy [email protected] • 1 year agomessage-square211fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink301•1 year agoThere are also only two different animals: elephants and non-elephants.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink70•1 year agoI think you are mistaken actually the different types of animal are frogs and not frogs
minus-squareMamboGatorlinkfedilinkEnglish18•1 year agoI am frog-fluid. Some days I am a frog and others I am not frog.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink8•1 year agoDoesn’t that happen just once, when tadpolemaxxing has been achieved ?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink48•1 year agoYour both wrong there are crabs and then there are crabs 🦀🦀🦀🦀
minus-square@[email protected]cakelinkfedilink15•1 year ago🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀 JAGEX SERVERS ARE POWERLESS AGAINST AUTH DELAY 🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish2•1 year agoCrabs and will eventually evolve into crab.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink63•1 year agoThere are bullfrogs and elephant bulls, so we can conclude that {🐸}∩{🐘}⊂{🐂}
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink9•1 year agoI think you actually want {🐸}∪{🐘}⊂{🐂} because ∪ is union and ∩ is intersection. There are no frogs that are also elephants so the set would be empty and thus couldn’t contain any bulls. 😔
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink9•1 year agoAktshually, the empty set is a subset of any other set 🤓 But also, the fact that frogs and elephants are disjunct is conjecture at this point
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink11•1 year agoHmm perhaps some kind of sliding scale is in order
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink3•1 year agoThere are elephants, non-elephants, and undetermined elephants. This comment was made by the intuitionistic and/or fuzzy logic gang.
minus-squareniftylinkfedilink5•1 year agoThe elephants exist in a state of being in the room and not being in the room
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink3•1 year agoYou gotta address the elephant in the room for it to exist
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink10•1 year agoAs a non-elephant in the room I feel overlooked
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink132•1 year agoAnything unrelated to elephants is irrelephant.
There are also only two different animals: elephants and non-elephants.
I think you are mistaken actually the different types of animal are frogs and not frogs
I am frog-fluid. Some days I am a frog and others I am not frog.
Doesn’t that happen just once, when tadpolemaxxing has been achieved ?
Your both wrong there are crabs and then there are crabs 🦀🦀🦀🦀
we are crab 🦀
🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀 JAGEX SERVERS ARE POWERLESS AGAINST AUTH DELAY 🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀
Crabs and will eventually evolve into crab.
Crabbbbb people craaaabbb peopleeee
Crabs and not yet crabs.
There are bullfrogs and elephant bulls, so we can conclude that {🐸}∩{🐘}⊂{🐂}
Frogness is a spectrum
That’s a very frogressive thing to say.
I think you actually want {🐸}∪{🐘}⊂{🐂} because ∪ is union and ∩ is intersection. There are no frogs that are also elephants so the set would be empty and thus couldn’t contain any bulls. 😔
Aktshually, the empty set is a subset of any other set 🤓
But also, the fact that frogs and elephants are disjunct is conjecture at this point
Hmm perhaps some kind of sliding scale is in order
There are elephants, non-elephants, and undetermined elephants.
This comment was made by the intuitionistic and/or fuzzy logic gang.
Are these elephants in the room right now?
The elephants exist in a state of being in the room and not being in the room
You gotta address the elephant in the room for it to exist
As a non-elephant in the room I feel overlooked
Anything unrelated to elephants is irrelephant.
This comment needs way more approval
120 is a lot.
You either are crabs or have crabs
Holy crab