@[email protected] to Lemmy [email protected] • 1 year agoNon-binarylemmy.worldimagemessage-square211fedilinkarrow-up11.43K
arrow-up11.43KimageNon-binarylemmy.world@[email protected] to Lemmy [email protected] • 1 year agomessage-square211fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish63•1 year agoFeel like there’s a Set Theory issue with this but I barely understand what little I can remember about it.
minus-squarepooberbee (they/she)linkfedilink38•1 year agoDoes the gender of all non-self-containing genders contain itself? This is the fundamental question of gender theory.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•1 year agoA bit can have two states: true or false. Additionally, the bit can be disabled altogether (null).
Feel like there’s a Set Theory issue with this but I barely understand what little I can remember about it.
Does the gender of all non-self-containing genders contain itself? This is the fundamental question of gender theory.
No, it’s only Russell’s question.
A bit can have two states:
trueorfalse. Additionally, the bit can be disabled altogether (null).