@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 1 year agoPlacebozmander.xyzimagemessage-square47fedilinkarrow-up11.16K
arrow-up11.16KimagePlacebozmander.xyz@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 1 year agomessage-square47fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish14•1 year agoYeah, I haven’t read the study of course. Only read about it. Which makes the claim above even more dubious. But hey, this is the future, who has the time to fact check anymore?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish10•1 year agoIf you only read about it that gives it 50% chance at best at being true. Luckily I also read about it, so together that makes it 100% true.
minus-squareTJA!linkfedilinkEnglish8•1 year agoYou could ask an AI, maybe they’ll invent a source for you
Yeah, I haven’t read the study of course. Only read about it. Which makes the claim above even more dubious. But hey, this is the future, who has the time to fact check anymore?
If you only read about it that gives it 50% chance at best at being true. Luckily I also read about it, so together that makes it 100% true.
Math checks out.
You could ask an AI, maybe they’ll invent a source for you