CaptainBasculin to [email protected] • 1 year agoWhich adaptation do you think has surpassed its source material in quality?message-square147fedilinkarrow-up1105
arrow-up1105message-squareWhich adaptation do you think has surpassed its source material in quality?CaptainBasculin to [email protected] • 1 year agomessage-square147fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink8•1 year agoInterview with a vampire. The book was good but the movie was better imo.
minus-squareAlphaOmegalinkfedilink2•1 year agoIt’s a common Mandela Effect. Interview with A vampire instead of interview with THE vampire. Read the book 6 times plus, saw original movie a few times and wrote a book report on it. For me it’s always been interview with A vampire
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink3•1 year agoOmg, wtf is even going on! I’ve read all her books like 3 or 4 times each and saw the movie like 5+ times and never knew that.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink2•1 year agoIt’s so common Google autocorrect gave me “interview with a vampire” as an option, and not “interview with the vampire” after only typing the string "interview "
Interview with a vampire. The book was good but the movie was better imo.
Mandela effect?
What?
It’s a common Mandela Effect. Interview with A vampire instead of interview with THE vampire.
Read the book 6 times plus, saw original movie a few times and wrote a book report on it. For me it’s always been interview with A vampire
Omg, wtf is even going on! I’ve read all her books like 3 or 4 times each and saw the movie like 5+ times and never knew that.
It’s so common Google autocorrect gave me “interview with a vampire” as an option, and not “interview with the vampire” after only typing the string "interview "