@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 1 year agoApple refuses to call Apple Intelligence 'AI'www.engadget.comexternal-linkmessage-square80fedilinkarrow-up1285
arrow-up1285external-linkApple refuses to call Apple Intelligence 'AI'www.engadget.com@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 1 year agomessage-square80fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish4•1 year agoWe’ll see how it pans out. As of now I don’t know of any phone manufacturer doing on-device AI… so??? Is that innovation?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish15•1 year agoGoogle does on the Pixel line, at least for pictures (and probably more).
minus-squareParadoxlinkfedilinkEnglish22•1 year agoGoogle has been doing on device stuff since at least the pixel 3
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish12•1 year agoI mean the biggest innovation here isn’t the “AI” (partially “on-device” or otherwise). It’s exposing the apps action hooks to the model.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish12•1 year agoOk, so either way, there’s innovation no? I get the “Apple bad” thing but come on, they actually ARE doing something here
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish5•1 year agoI dunno if ‘Siri but functional’ is good enough to get points from me. That said this is definitely good for the industry
We’ll see how it pans out. As of now I don’t know of any phone manufacturer doing on-device AI… so??? Is that innovation?
Google does on the Pixel line, at least for pictures (and probably more).
Google has been doing on device stuff since at least the pixel 3
I mean the biggest innovation here isn’t the “AI” (partially “on-device” or otherwise). It’s exposing the apps action hooks to the model.
Ok, so either way, there’s innovation no?
I get the “Apple bad” thing but come on, they actually ARE doing something here
I dunno if ‘Siri but functional’ is good enough to get points from me. That said this is definitely good for the industry