☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆ to [email protected]English • 10 months agoAmerica’s assassination attempt on Huawei is backfiringwww.economist.comexternal-linkmessage-square11fedilinkarrow-up126cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up126external-linkAmerica’s assassination attempt on Huawei is backfiringwww.economist.com☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆ to [email protected]English • 10 months agomessage-square11fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink9•10 months agoNo it’s not, anyone can get a license to create an ARM chipset but you do need to pay for a license.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink8•10 months agoIt’s neither. It’s a specification that you can use to build your own chip. So it’s more like MPEG where you can read the doc and create your own implementation.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink3•10 months agoHow can you have a preference if you don’t understand?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink4•10 months agoYes, on the licensing front RISC-V is better.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink6•10 months agoClosed source but if you pay enough you can get the source
deleted by creator
No it’s not, anyone can get a license to create an ARM chipset but you do need to pay for a license.
deleted by creator
It’s neither. It’s a specification that you can use to build your own chip.
So it’s more like MPEG where you can read the doc and create your own implementation.
deleted by creator
How can you have a preference if you don’t understand?
deleted by creator
Yes, on the licensing front RISC-V is better.
Closed source but if you pay enough you can get the source