• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1161 year ago

    Double negative confused me for a second and I was sad. Opposes the ban! Want gender affirming care available. Excellent.

    • BarqsHasBite
      link
      fedilink
      181 year ago

      Oh I missed that entirely. Sloppy writing, it should be arranged “opposes bans on gender affirming care”.

      • twelve20two
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        Gotta get them clicks tho. Maybe we’re at the beginning of a transition from, “shocking and attention-grabbing headlines,” to, “attention-grabbing but also poorly written in a way that it’ll agitate an even wider wash of readers”

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      121 year ago

      Same! “Supports care” would have been an easier concept, though a little different from “opposes ban” I guess…

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      I find it quite common (and confusing) for certain news types like policy, eg “party A reverses the disapproval to oppose the once-unacceptable ban”