• WorkingClassCorpse [comrade/them, any]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Ya know though, I’ve seen him do site bans like that for reactionary pro-israel comments before, so I suppose I shouldn’t be completely surprised.

        I’m assuming this comment didn’t take place on a midwest.social comm, right?

        edit: he does hit the mark on occasion, for instance about a day ago he banned someone for being a landlord which is waow-based

    • QuietCupcake [any, they/them]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      331 year ago

      There can be good users and bad users, even good mods and bad mods from any one instance, though it usually ends up trending in one or the other direction over time. This little incident isn’t very auspicious for their instance though. My experience has always been rather hit or miss with midwest.social.

      • Nakoichi [they/them]OP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        341 year ago

        Yeah I might have jumped the gun on calling for defederation. We should just give them the db0 treatment: ban their admins but stay federated, the ultimate power move.

        • QuietCupcake [any, they/them]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          291 year ago

          Yeah, I think that treatment should be the standard response to any instances with shitty anti-communist mods/admins but that still have at least some contingent of cool users. I think midwest.social fits that category. But yes, doing that is not only the funniest move, as we learned with db0, it’s like getting the best of both worlds. If the general users of an instance start getting regularly abusive, especially towards more vulnerable groups, that’s when it’s time to consider the full defed option imo. Fortunately, I don’t think we’ve had an issue with that on the scale of an entire instance since, what… blajah and shitjustworks?