@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 1 year agoI just cited myself.mander.xyzimagemessage-square238fedilinkarrow-up1859
arrow-up1859imageI just cited myself.mander.xyz@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 1 year agomessage-square238fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•1 year agoDo that same math, but use .5555… instead of .9999…
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish8•1 year agoHave you tried it? You get 0.555… which kinda proves the point does it not?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish5•1 year ago??? Not sure what you’re aiming for. It proves that the setup works, I suppose. x = 0.555… 10x = 5.555… 10x = 5 + 0.555… 10x = 5+x 9x = 5 x = 5/9 5/9 = 0.555… So it shows that this approach will indeed provide a result for x that matches what x is supposed to be. Hopefully it helped?
Do that same math, but use .5555… instead of .9999…
Have you tried it? You get 0.555… which kinda proves the point does it not?
???
Not sure what you’re aiming for. It proves that the setup works, I suppose.
x = 0.555…
10x = 5.555…
10x = 5 + 0.555…
10x = 5+x
9x = 5
x = 5/9
5/9 = 0.555…
So it shows that this approach will indeed provide a result for x that matches what x is supposed to be.
Hopefully it helped?