• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    31
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    It does not begin.

    It moves ahead of your perceptions.

    That said everything has already happened all at once and is over. Our sensual reality refuses to see that. We are too small to see it.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      62 years ago

      No physical mechanisms predefines future events (or is there one ?).

      So, I could state that the future does not exist yet and the past as ceased to exist.

      in that statement I have a problem with the definition of existence. Does the definition of existence exist itself ? This is (is it ?) more a problem of terminology than philosophy or physics.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    92 years ago

    It is a human concept that does not exist in reality, the future could for the universe have the same value of the past, the great snake eating its tail

  • ℕ𝕖𝕞𝕠
    link
    fedilink
    52 years ago

    The future is in the future

    And the past is a victory walk

    Well I need to make you understand, girl

    I’M A MAN NOT A DISCO BALL!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      52 years ago

      Anthropologically speaking this is the best answer. Our brain needs a certain span of time to establish perceived reality.

  • Lotus Eater
    link
    fedilink
    7
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    I feel like we’re in it lately with: the lab grown meat, 3D printing building and drones, CRISPR technology, and even something as “basic” as our smartphones.

    At this point the only thing that I’m waiting for is space travel 😎

    Edit: ugh, just read the rest of the responses and people are such bummers

    • Thelsim
      link
      fedilink
      52 years ago

      Thank you for your answer! Nice to see something besides a literal interpretation of the question (Though to be fair, it was also the first thing that popped in my head :)
      Anyway, I have to agree with you. A lot of things that seemed almost impossible or ridiculously far-fetched when I was little are now common place or close to becoming reality. And I’m not even that old! (forever in my early thirties *cough* *cough*)

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    62 years ago

    Never. Not being started is its definition itself

    Unless you make it relative to something else. Now is the future of before, and before was the future of a earlier before

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        2
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        long double future_time = static_cast(time(nullptr)) + (5.391247L * pow(10.0L, -44.0L))

        Fixed-precision arithmetic would probably be more appropriate here, but since I’m lazy, long double works. Although I am curious now if a long double has sufficient precision to give a meaningful value for this.

        • Dr. Bluefall
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 years ago

          I feel like at some point, you’d need arbitrary precision and arbitrarily-sized real numbers in order to meaningfully represent it.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    42 years ago
    Colonel Sandurz: Try here. Stop.
    Dark Helmet: What the hell am I looking at? When does this happen in the movie?
    Colonel Sandurz: Now. You're looking at now, sir. Everything that happens now, is happening now.
    Dark Helmet: What happened to then?
    Colonel Sandurz: We passed then.
    Dark Helmet: When?
    Colonel Sandurz: Just now. We're at now now.
    Dark Helmet: Go back to then.
    Colonel Sandurz: When?
    Dark Helmet: Now.
    Colonel Sandurz: Now?
    Dark Helmet: Now.
    Colonel Sandurz: I can't.
    Dark Helmet: Why?
    Colonel Sandurz: We missed it.
    Dark Helmet: When?
    Colonel Sandurz: Just now.
    Dark Helmet: When will then be now?
    Colonel Sandurz: Soon.
    Dark Helmet: How soon?