Like an estimated two-thirds of the world’s population, I don’t digest lactose well, which makes the occasional latte an especially pricey proposition. So it was a pleasant surprise when, shortly after moving to San Francisco, I ordered a drink at Blue Bottle Coffee and didn’t have to ask—or pay extra—for a milk alternative. Since 2022, the once Oakland-based, now Nestlé-owned cafe chain has defaulted to oat milk, both to cut carbon emissions and because lots of its affluent-tending customers were already choosing it as their go-to.

Plant-based milks, a multibillion-dollar global market, aren’t just good for the lactose intolerant: They’re also better for the climate. Dairy cows belch a lot of methane, a greenhouse gas 25 times more potent than carbon dioxide; they contribute at least 7 percent of US methane output, the equivalent emissions of 10 million cars. Cattle need a lot of room to graze, too: Plant-based milks use about a tenth as much land to produce the same quantity of milk. And it takes almost a thousand gallons of water to manufacture a gallon of dairy milk—four times the water cost of alt-milk from oats or soy.

But if climate concerns push us toward the alt-milk aisle, dairy still has price on its side. Even though plant-based milks are generally much less resource-intensive, they’re often more expensive. Walk into any Starbucks, and you’ll likely pay around 70 cents extra for nondairy options.

. Dairy’s affordability edge, explains María Mascaraque, an analyst at market research firm Euromonitor International, relies on the industry’s ability to produce “at larger volumes, which drives down the cost per carton.” American demand for milk alternatives, though expected to grow by 10 percent a year through 2030, can’t beat those economies of scale. (Globally, alt-milks aren’t new on the scene—coconut milk is even mentioned in the Sanskrit epic Mahābhārata, which is thousands of years old.)

What else contributes to cow milk’s dominance? Dairy farmers are “political favorites,” says Daniel Sumner, a University of California, Davis, agricultural economist. In addition to support like the “Dairy Checkoff,” a joint government-industry program to promote milk products (including the “Got Milk?” campaign), they’ve long raked in direct subsidies currently worth around $1 billion a year.

Big Milk fights hard to maintain those benefits, spending more than $7 million a year on lobbying. That might help explain why the US Department of Agriculture has talked around the climate virtues of meat and dairy alternatives, refusing to factor sustainability into its dietary guidelines—and why it has featured content, such as a 2013 article by then–Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack, trumpeting the dairy industry as “leading the way in sustainable innovation.”

But the USDA doesn’t directly support plant-based milk. It does subsidize some alt-milk ingredients—soybean producers, like dairy, net close to $1 billion a year on average, but that crop largely goes to feeding meat- and dairy-producing livestock and extracting oil. A 2021 report by industry analysts Mintec Limited and Frost Procurement Adventurer also notes that, while the inputs for dairy (such as cattle feed) for dairy are a little more expensive than typical plant-milk ingredients, plant alternatives face higher manufacturing costs. Alt-milk makers, Sumner says, may also have thinner profit margins: Their “strategy for growth is advertisement and promotion and publicity,” which isn’t cheap.

Starbucks, though, does benefit from economies of scale. In Europe, the company is slowly dropping premiums for alt-milks, a move it attributes to wanting to lower corporate emissions. “Market-level conditions allow us to move more quickly” than other companies, a spokesperson for the coffee giant told me, but didn’t say if or when the price drop would happen elsewhere.

In the United States, meanwhile, it’s a waiting game to see whether the government or corporations drive down alt-milk costs. Currently, Sumner says, plant-based milk producers operate under an assumption that “price isn’t the main thing” for their buyers—as long as enough privileged consumers will pay up, alt-milk can fill a premium niche. But it’s going to take a bigger market than that to make real progress in curbing emissions from food.

  • @pedroapero@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    23
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Are there actual studies showing that plant-based alternatives are better for health (on individuals that digest lactose just fine like me) ?

    I switched to alt-milks for ecological reason but media keep talking about the negative health effects of «ultra-transformed food», which alt-milk very much sounds like…

  • @Rearsays@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    102 years ago

    What’s more local, whatever is more local is likely better for the planet unless that UK oat milk in that Toronto Coffee shop flew there on its own.

  • Dynamo
    link
    fedilink
    52 years ago

    It it doesn’t come from a mammal it ain’t milk.

  • @CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    42 years ago

    Good question. For some dumb reason, we keep telling kids to drink milk, too, as well as try to get them to drink it in schools, when we should be doing anything BUT that. We should be telling them to cut dairy to as close to zero as possible.

    It’s still part of the food pyramid is it not? WTAF.

  • @RagingRobot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    17
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    We don’t need non human milk in the first place so I don’t need a milk alternative either lol

    Also, for the record I’m mostly off human milk too now that I’m an adult

  • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin
    link
    fedilink
    112 years ago

    Because it’s a relatively new competitor on the market that doesn’t have the same agricultural base as dairy products which warrants subsidies aimed at keeping farmers from losing their shirts during lean seasons?

    • Too Ren
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      72 years ago

      I agree with cutting off subsidies, but for people calling stopping production, it clearly just doesn’t taste the same.

      • capital
        link
        fedilink
        12 years ago

        Those people prioritize reducing the suffering the dairy industry causes over that taste people like.

      • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin
        link
        fedilink
        22 years ago

        No but that not the same isn’t an uncanny valley kinda not the same. It’s still a milk product because it’s meant to be able to be used the same way, but it’s still its own thing.

        • Too Ren
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 years ago

          Yeah, just for me I like the taste of normal milk, and haven’t really found milk substitutes that I like the taste of.

  • @satans_crackpipe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    11
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    This is a weird advertisement. Drink water. Plant milk does not have the protein or calorie density as dairy milk. You may as well drink water and eat your greens instead of supporting industries that are gentle rapists of the earth. I’ll drink my own vomit before reading that rag again.

  • Clegko
    link
    fedilink
    582 years ago

    Because most plant juice tastes like shit and has the wrong mouth-feel for most things we use cow milk for. Its not rocket surgery.

    • I’m not vegan or even vegetarian, so I feel pretty impartial on this. My partner uses oat milk for their coffee, and over the years I just got used to using it straight, or in cereals, etc. Now I greatly prefer it. It’s just “milk” for me now.

      Never thought it would happen, but getting cow milk when I’m out feels off - that mouth-feel you mention; just doesn’t sit right anymore. It really is an acquired taste.

      • Lord Goose
        link
        fedilink
        72 years ago

        Right there with you. I’ve been living the plant milk life for years at this point and cow milk just tastes so… water-y for lack of a better explanation.

        • rurutheguru
          link
          fedilink
          22 years ago

          My wife says she can “taste the cow” in the milk, in the same way she could “taste the goat” in goat milk before moving to plant based milks.

          I know exactly what she means though, it’s a weird aftertaste that tastes ‘wild’ in the same way you can differentiate wild game from beef or pork.

          However, it seems only people who have been off cow milk for a while can identify this element.

          • Yeah! That’s the perfect way to put it, thank you. It’s like a foreign extra flavour - a certain cowiness that I didn’t notice growing up. Cow milk used to taste like “default milk,” where everything else was a variation on that normal base. But now it’s one of the “other” milks, because I taste it so infrequently.

        • @Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          22 years ago

          When you say “It’s not rocket science/surgery” it implies that what you’re saying is an evidence, in this case their answer is false, it’s not subsidized because it tastes better or people enjoy it more, it’s purely political.

    • @Anonymousllama@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      232 years ago

      Spot on. People are out here trying to play like almond, oat, soy and every other milk substitute is exactly the same as dairy based milk, it’s not and will not ever be, they’re different products

      Also pretending that people swapping from dairy to alternate milks will somehow impact the looming climate crisis is also pretty disingenuous

      • @threeduck@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        72 years ago

        If we all went vegan we’d reduce food based emissions by 70%, which is 15% of the entire planets GHG emissions. Not to mention recovering 75% of farm land.

        It really is a no brainer if you want to make a difference. And if I, “a rural New Zealander who grew up on a dairy farm who said he’d never eat a vegetarian meal in his life” can convert to veganism based on the logic of it, surely anyone could.

          • @threeduck@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            22 years ago

            I’m going to use your sound logical deductions and reasoning skills to reply to your comment in kind, ready?

            I doubt it

            Yeah? Well I doubt THAT.

            • @commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              12 years ago

              you can doubt whether i doubt something but i am the authority on whether i doubt something so self-reporting my doubt is the strongest evidence that can be gathered in support of the claim.

            • @commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              12 years ago

              a claim made without evidence can be dismissed without evidence. i’ve presented exactly as much evedince as the claim to which i was responding.

          • @Sodis@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            22 years ago

            Why? Because all the animal herders will still produce lots of meat at a loss and then just burn everything no one wants to eat?

            • @commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              12 years ago

              i don’t believe the methodology used to calculate emissions from animal agriculture is appropriate: every examination i’ve done has attributed emissions to animals that are actually conservation, like feeding cattle cottonseed and then attributing the impacts of cotton grown for textiles to cattle.

              • @Sodis@feddit.de
                link
                fedilink
                32 years ago

                But then you doubt the number and not the general effect of reducing carbon emissions by switching to a plant-based diet, right? Because it is pretty obvious, that growing plants and then feeding those plants to animals is way more inefficient than eating the plants without extra steps.

                • @commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  22 years ago

                  a lot of what is fed to animals are parts of plants that people can’t or won’t eat. there may be some reduction but i don’t believe it can be anywhere near 70%

          • @Honytawk@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            12 years ago

            If you see how much crops we need to grow and fresh water we need to feed a cow, you’d see how inefficient meat is.

            70% of all the crops we grow is to feed our livestock.

            Meaning for 1/3 on our plate, we use more than double the resources than the other 2/3 combined.

        • Clegko
          link
          fedilink
          32 years ago

          Do we really need to recover farmland, though? At least in the US, we have way more than enough to go around. And there’s like 19 people in New Zealand, y’all don’t need the space. :P

          • @clover@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            52 years ago

            Or look at the deforestation of the Amazon rainforest. That all done to produce more farmland. So, if we were using or land more efficiently we wouldn’t be carving up the “lungs of the world”

          • @threeduck@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            72 years ago

            Yeah our rivers in NZ got so polluted with cow effluence and runoff the waters became legally unswimmable. Then the right wing government changed what is legally define as “polluted” so people could swim again.

            Farm land (in particular farm land unsuitable for crops) can be used to plant forests, further reducing climate change. If the boomer generation lost 6-10 IQ points on average for leaded petrol, ours will see that again from high PPM CO2 rates.

        • @commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          72 years ago

          there is no reason to think farmland would be “recovered” or converted to any less- environmentally destructive use.

  • @SRo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    202 years ago

    Because it tastes like shit. And I don’t even drink milk but you can’t even cook with the substitute shit.

    • Very_Bad_Janet
      link
      fedilink
      102 years ago

      Oatmilk creamer in coffee or chai, however, is delicious. Some brands are better tasting than others.

      • @UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 years ago

        Yeah, but store bought is expensive AF. Oatmilk is one of the easiest milks to make at home. Literally get rolled oats, blend them lightly with a blender along with water and strain out the fibre. That’s it… That’s oat milk for you!

          • @witten@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            22 years ago

            If you want something closer to the flavor and mouthfeel of heavily processed commercial oat milk, you need to blend in oil, salt, sugar, and an emulsifier (I use xanthan) after filtering out the oat solids.

    • @DrPop@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      42 years ago

      Oatmilk is pretty close to the real thing without being an all out substitute. I use it for day to day stuff and if I have a recipe that requires milk I buy a small amount versus a whole gallon. Most do just taste like nut juice though.

      • discodoubloon
        link
        fedilink
        4
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        It’s also 1000x better for the environment. I don’t give a fuck if my brand tastes 87% like milk at that point. I still and will use creams for cooking, but milk and cereal is such a weird industry now that it’s all really expensive.

    • @UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      52 years ago

      I don’t believe you have used the correct plant milks for the correct uses.

      1. Soya Milk: Kinda meh taste for hot and cold beverages. U won’t go wrong with it. However, this ain’t the best product for all uses. U can make tofu tho, which is nice.
      2. Oat milk: The best choice for cold beverages. Oat milk has a flavor that is just much better than soy milk in my opinion. While u can use it for hot beverages (and it’s delicious there), u need to be kinda careful. The more u heat up oat milk, the thicker it becomes due to the starch present in it. Therefore, never try to boil, or come close to boiling oat milk ever.
      3. Coconut milk: If u have anything to say about coconut milk, gtfo from here. It’s fatty and can be a substitute for cream. Needless to say, it is absolutely delicious! South Indian curries make use of this. There’s also a drink that I love called “Solkadhi”, which is an Indian drink made using coconut milk. U just can’t talk smack abt it…
      4. Chickpea milk: Now this is a use case which I don’t know if many people would agree with me out on or no. What I do is, I make chickpea milk to make youghurt out of it (just ferment it using soaking water). Now, in my experience, this yogurt tastes like shit if u consume it alone. HOWEVER, if you use it in curries, gohdddd r u in for the treat of ur lifetime! One, u get a beautiful thick curry and two, u get that amazing acidic flavor. It’s just rlly rlly good! Highly recommend if u guys haven’t tried this out yet.
      5. Other plant milks: There are a gazillion other plant milks. I just mentioned the ones above that I have personal experience with.

      In conclusion, try not to fixate on one plant milk alternative and then attempt to use it for all use cases of dairy milk. Remember, there is no monolithic “dairy milk alternative”. Different plant milks serve different purposes. If used correctly, u’ll get the best culinary experience of ur life!

        • @UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          32 years ago

          Well sure… The reason why I don’t use dairy milk is because:

          1. lactose intolerance
          2. plant based milk is much better for the environment
          3. DIY plant based milk is cheap af
          4. Ethical concerns with the animal husbandry industry
  • Queen HawlSera
    link
    fedilink
    English
    22 years ago

    Because the fiction that plant-based products are healthy has been heavily debunked by just how sickly vegans are on average?