CEO compensation vs employee compensation.
CEO pay has skyrocketed in comparison to the pay of the employees, this needs to change.
Why is that an issue? If they are the founder of the company I think they deserve it, and if not, there must be some logical reason why they pay that person so much…
If they are the founder, they are likely not a public company yet and can grant themselves stock at great rates. Most do-ers aren’t CEOs, they are busy doing.
I think they’re saying it’s an issue specifically in reference to how employee wages have grown in comparison. If we look at previous decades, you’ll see that CEO and other executive level pay has increased substantially, and has absolutely left employee pay in the dust. That isn’t to say people shouldn’t be paid more for a good or important job, but we should probably be keeping a watch to ensure those with plenty don’t take even more from those with little. And if those at the top are taking more, historically, than their fair share, then that needs brought in line.
This is a very good response. Thanks for writing.
I’d bet most people can get behind the idea that those in leadership positions or saddled with greater responsibility should be compensated more. The issue for me is the magnitude of that compensation.
United States specific: The naming system of hospital units or some other standardized indicator of what skill level is actually practiced on that unit.
An ICU should be an ICU, not “Intensive Care Unit” at this hospital, but “Critical Care Unit” at that other hospital and the"Stepdown Unit" here is called “Progressive Care Unit” there, but “Transitional Care Unit” at that other place.
It leads to so much confusion when trying to transfer patients between facilities and/or understand what kind of care they were receiving at a previous admission at a different facility.
Que speed, the one you’re in is always the slowest.
Que sorpresa!
Date formats. Can never tell if dd/mm/yyyy, mm/dd/yyyy, yyyy-mm-dd…
This is why I always use letters for the month when I can. There’s no confusing 3 Oct 2023.
March 8th, 2023?
Yes, very good, you used the letters just like they said.
The yyyy-mm-dd format (ISO 8601) is the only one that is unambiguous, because no one so far in history has ever used the yyyy-dd-mm format (at least until some xkcd-reading jokester probably will start using it just out of spite). I use ISO 8601 everywhere. It has the additional benefit that filenames get sorted correctly in lexographical order.
As someone that works with huge amounts of data with dates in varied formats… PLEASE let this be standardised. :')
I was gonna reply the “S” in “ISO” stands for “standardization” but apparently ISO doesn’t stand for anything.
I was expecting a KFC situation, but no:
Because ‘International Organization for Standardization’ would have different acronyms in different languages (IOS in English, OIN in French), our founders decided to give it the short form ISO. ISO is derived from the Greek word isos (ίσος, meaning “equal”). Whatever the country, whatever the language, the short form of our name is always ISO.
Many years ago, I came across a forum that formatted dates yyyy-dd-mm. That was such a traumatic memory that I still remember it.
Only way I’d do it is by pissing everyone off. DD/YYYY/MM
Let there be carnage: DD/YY/MMMM
how about YYMDMDYY
YMDYYDMY
YMCA
IFTSAT
YTMND
Yeenage Tutant Minja Nurtles D
ISO-8601 has the answer for computers, and maybe humans too. It’s the last way you mentioned for everyday use.
Lens mounts
Good luck with that haha.
The law throughout all countries in the world
Printer ink cartridges. Printer manufacturers are using a loss leader pricing scheme, and I don’t like it. Let them compete!
A lot of the printers these days uses ink tanks. But yeah. Use laser
Switch to laser.
Or if B&W is fine, go for inkless
Computer devices. Installing Arch Linux and syncing most Important directories with Syncthing so you can work on every device and be sync around the world.
Power tool batteries.
After moving into a house, I decided to buy a small collection of power tools for household work. Batteries were a major consideration. I previously had a 12v DeWalt drill that served me well (still works too), and leaning on that, picked up a kit with a skilsaw, hammer drill, drill/driver, work light, oscillating tool, and a sawsall… all from the 20v line from DeWalt. Since then we added a hedge trimmer, string trimmer and electric mower, all using the same 20v system. We have a small fleet of batteries, which work with all of our tools.
The risk is if DeWalt decides that they’re just going to abruptly stop selling the batteries between now and when we need replacements. If so, I’m sure we’ll have several expensive options to pick from in order to continue to have tools. I don’t think that will happen anytime soon, since all of the batteries we have are compatible with their flex volt thing, which they seem to be happily supporting across their entire ecosystem.
The next tool I’m looking at buying is an impact wrench for some light automotive work; the only power tool type thing I wish that they had, which they currently do not, is a snow blower. If they ever release one that takes the flex volt or 20v “Max” batteries, I’m going to jump at that.
Shoveling snow sucks.
Feels like a snowblower would need a pretty meaty power source, 20V might struggle to cut the mustard. I ended up going with a corded one because I couldn’t face another noisy 2 stroke engine.
I’d be okay with them putting out a wired one, they’re not foreign to making wired appliances. We have a wired shopvac type thing from DeWalt. It works great.
It’s not quite what you’re talking about because they’re still brand-specific, but the batteries are a big part of why I went with Ryobi. They’ve done a really good job of sticking with their battery ecosystem IMO, and it’s now kind of a big part of their marketing so I think they’re going to stick with it for a while, at least for their regular 18v hand tools. If I ever come across some old blue Ryobi tools at a yard sale they should work just fine with the lithium batteries even though they were designed for NiCad batteries, and I’m pretty sure you can still get a dual chemistry charger that works for both kinds of battery.
I’m pretty sure that in the same time Ryobi has been around using using essentially the same batteries most of the big names are on their 2nd or 3rd battery standard.
Admittedly they haven’t been perfect, they’ve done pretty well sticking with their 18v and 40v lines, but I think they’ve had a couple different standards for smaller, lower-powered tools that have come and gone, although I like what they’ve been doing with their newer USB lithium line so I hope that sticks around. I think they also had a riding mower battery that was only around for a couple years before they replaced it with a new incomparable one.
And I’m very much a DIY homeowner weekend warrior type, if I used my tools professionally I don’t know that I’d want to depend on Ryobi, but they’re more than adequate for what I need them for.
This factor was why I decided to use Bosch blue cordless. They haven’t changed the battery interface so all the 18v tools are compatible and continue to be. Good to know about Ryobi.
The thing is, when you open up any of these batteries, they all have either standard lithium ion 18650 or 21700 cells and they are all nominally 3.7v/cell. In other words, they are standardised in every way except the interface, which just happens to fit one brand of tool.
I have an old Makita NiMH drill that I’ve converted to use the Bosch batteries. This 25 year old tool can continue to serve me because there’s no such thing as a Bosch electron and that’s what’s so beautiful about the universal laws of physics.
Faucet water pressure. Not so strong so that it doesn’t make me wet but strong enough to feel confident that I actually washed my hand.
I think this abides by the idea of this post, but I would standardize language across the world. Whether it is an existing language or a new language doesn’t really matter or maybe a mix of the biggest existing languages.
I remember reading a book where in the future everyone spoke a combination of English and Chinese. They seem pretty incompatible though.
It’s such an interesting idea, isn’t it? Theres a lot to gain but also, a language can mean a lot to people: identity, community, history. If we’re at A, I can look ahead and see the benefits of getting to Z, but I have no idea what all happens in between.
Gonna have to disagree there.
Each language is a culture and each is special, different from every other, and removing or transforming them changes that.
What a dystopian nightmare!
Is it? When migrant workers are able to speak the same language as the natives, they would be able to integrate faster and look out for one another better.
Right now, large corporations make use of migrant workers who are unaware of their rights in host countries to undermine the working rights of the host workers. A diverse workforce is much less likely to unionize, and large corporations know that.
That there SHOULD be as many standards as possible!
… why?
May seem like an obvious one considering where we are but standards for communication apps
If everything uses a standard like activitypub/matrix and becomes cross compatible I don’t need to have 6 different messaging apps
Provided the standard is completely backwards compatible of course I think it would be awesome to just let people have their messaging app of choice and be able to talk to everyone else (I think there might actually be an EU regulation coming that enforces this for larger messaging apps)
Electric car chargers.
This is the direction the industry is going to go. F#kn standardize it already, with a reasonable future-proofing schema that handles various voltages, and puts out what the car specifies.
Well damn, that was fast. I only asked for it like, an hour ago. Good job, world.
I thought so too!
Here is an alternative Piped link(s):
https://piped.video/ZJOfyMCEzjQ?si=nEff3VlOaLXuUEPS
Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.
I’m open-source; check me out at GitHub.
Camera lens mounts, increased competition within systems would be great.
Micro Four Thirds was an attempt to do that. It didn’t work out so well.
I thought everyone bought Canon adapters and called it a day lol
