• 👍Maximum Derek👍
    link
    fedilink
    English
    52 years ago

    My grandmother was born in the US not quite 2 years after her parents immigrated. I think semi-often that if she had been born in Sweden I’d be eligible for a passport. I suspect that if the barrier to entry were that low I’d have made the move.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    532 years ago

    I moved to Germany from the US this year. There is subsidized public transit, universal healthcare, minimum vacation time, a heavy union culture, strong renter-favored laws (although capitalist for profit housing is still an ever growing plague).

    As others pointed out, the terminology isn’t a great tool for debate without an agree upon definition. But yes, I would move to a country that cared about people over profits.

  • SeaJ
    link
    fedilink
    162 years ago

    We have socialist policies here in the US. We just have fewer of them than other countries.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    222 years ago

    Social(ist) policies are extremely removed from socialism. The countries people list here, aka Canada, Danmark and Ireland among others are extremely capitalist still. This thread is therefore useless.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      62 years ago

      Yeah, I feel like “a country with strong social safety nets” would be a better way of putting it

      Socialism has a TON of historical baggage

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    3
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    In theory I could just move back to England, but right now I’m quite happy where I’m at. If a job opportunity came up, who knows?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    202 years ago

    Probably. If I could get a job with the same standard of living, the moving costs were paid (do not overlook this, it’s insane), the paperwork was trivial or non existant, sure. Bonus perks would be language classes and walkability/bikeability.

    It depends on what “socialism” entails, but US capitalism has failed me and mine, has caused so much suffering in my friends and family.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    217
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    First, please define what you mean by socialism. That word encompasses a lot of very different forms of government, even when it’s used “correctly”, and it’s typically not.

    The Nazis called themselves socialists, and I’m not moving there.

    When many people say socialism, what they mean is capitalist democracy with a strong social safety net, strong government regulation, and highly progressive taxation.

    Edit: for the love of god, please do a little bit of reading about socialism before reinforcing my point that this word is used terribly. We won’t take the wiki as ultimate truth, but please read. Be better. Read and think first. Comment later.

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      632 years ago

      When many people say socialism, what they mean is capitalist democracy with a strong social safety net, strong government regulation, and highly progressive taxation.

      Let’s go with that definition since that’s what most people think of as socialist.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        61
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        That is objectively not socialism (any definition of socialism that begins by defining it as a form of capitalism is fundamentally confused)

        That said, I’d agree that it is a widespread misunderstanding today. And what people mean when they say socialism is usually actually social democracy (which despite sounding like the word socialism is a mixed system based on capitalism)

        Using that misunderstanding as the definition I would definitely live in many of those countries. Many have some of the highest qualities of life in the world, low rates of poverty, universal access to good healthcare and education, and good social mobility.

        E.g Denmark, Sweden, Norway, Finland, Iceland, Germany

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            3
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            Yes… Please reread my last comment more slowly… particularly the first two paragraphs.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              12 years ago

              I swear. This place is way more toxic than Reddit.

              I can’t imagine someone being so condescending there on a topic like this.

              Please read the Wikipedia article. We don’t have to agree that Wikipedia is an ultimate source of truth, but it is a pretty good article.

              I don’t think I’ll be able to communicate anything more to someone who tells me to “read more slowly”.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                12 years ago

                You’re the one who responded to their comment without actually reading it, why are you complaining about them?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            62 years ago

            Exactly. This is what the person you are responding to is saying as well.

            They state that the above definition of socialism is wrong as it defines it as a from of capitalism with social features. But under the condition that this is meant he would move into these countries.

      • Blake [he/him]
        link
        fedilink
        82 years ago

        When many people say socialism, what they mean is capitalist democracy

        Lol. Lmao, even

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        18
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Provided there is an appropriate amount of technocracy (decisions made by experts rather than politicians), it’d be hard for me to think of a better form of government.

        Anyway, this was largely the US until Regan. Social safety net could’ve been stronger, but that had to evolve. Same as in Europe.

        Except , racism. Addressing that is not a part of any definition of socialism that I’m aware of. Equality is certainly going along with the spirit of this definition of “socialism”

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        82 years ago

        “Socialists of Lemmy, would you move to a country that someone who has absolutely no idea what socialism is thinks is socialist?”

        Lmao.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        752 years ago

        The question doesn’t need to be hypothetical. I am moving to a country exactly like that. From the US.

        Lack of modern health care coverage alone is enough to justify it. A bonus is that the quality of life across the board is significantly higher.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            122 years ago

            I read that Denmark releases a list every six months of the skills and degrees that are allowed to immigrate, or get priority or something like that. From looking at the last one I assume they value education, the liberal arts and humanities a lot more than the US.

            It ends up being a catch 22. When you want to leave the US because of a lack of upward mobility, social services, jobs in your field, and you can’t save because of healthcare, rent, and debt, then how can you have enough money to move to another state, much less another country?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            22 years ago

            Portugal and a lot of effort (Plus cash to invest).

            Basically going through the Golden Visa process (Which has changed substantially the last year, happy to explain more if curious)

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            8
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            Can’t answer the where at, but most likely by having an in demand skill and/or a job already lined up. Either that or they had family there. Immigration away from here is basically impossible otherwise.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            42 years ago

            They have qualifications. Or relatives. Or something of value to offer.

            If you have a PhD or MD (additionally, you know, just straight money), you can emigrate to a lot of places. Probably most places.

    • Bruno Finger
      link
      fedilink
      72 years ago

      Why couldn’t that what you just described be called something different other than “socialism” then? Sounds like a bad move to make it fall under that same umbrella especially since that term is very frowned upon if not straight out forbidden in a few European countries for example.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        302 years ago

        It is, the term for this type of system is called Social Democracy which is not a synonym for socialism, but people (Americans at least) confused and conflate the two terms to the point that they’ve become one and the same in the minds of many people who don’t really understand the terms or their origins.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        12 years ago

        Words, used in non technical contexts, mean what people mean when they use them.

        Descriptive. Not proscriptive.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              12 years ago

              So in your view these people are inherently more ‘great’ than others? What would you call these people who are so above average? The over people? The overmen? The ubermensch… oh whoops

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                22 years ago

                Are you seriously trying to compare that statement to Nazi ideology?

                Yes. I think that great artists and scientists and chefs and authors and teachers and those that work hard contribute more to society than others.

                The Nobel prizes are being announced this week.

                The work of Katalin Karikó and Drew Weissman saved millions. Most people are not capable of that.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  12 years ago

                  Yes I think subdividing humanity into the great people who perform all the work, and the lowly masses that exist to serve them is at the heart of Nazi ideology so I am making that comparison.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        172 years ago

        Because we’re too busy categorizing this stupid shit into bins of “good” and “bad” when reality is a greyscale between these two. These are fairly reasonable points and should be viewed as a more centrist POV, but since we (read: primarily North America) have a tribal “us vs. them” animosity about it we lump many reasonable ideas together on each end of the spectrum. Things like not having to go bankrupt when you or a loved one needs an emergency hospital visit somehow automatically gets lumped in with the other extreme “socialist” ideas just to solely argue against it and not budge from their end of the extreme.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          22 years ago

          Wow, yes this is so true for many discussions online and increasingly offline as well. Nuance seems to be not welcomed. Sometimes even suggesting there might be nuance or the topic might be more complicated than black and white already puts you firmly in the enemy camp.

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      22 years ago

      Based on existing socialist countries? So cold that the air explodes upon contact with human skin

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        22 years ago

        Not just cold, but also wet, dark and grey. Yet somehow we’re the happiest country in the world. Go figure.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          12 years ago

          My most recent vacation was north of the arctic circle in Finland in December and I didn’t want to leave. It was a multi day sled tour across Lapland. I wish I could find a way to make it practical for me to move somewhere in Scandinavia, but for now I’ll just visit when I can.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    102 years ago

    I’m a Canadian, but if I had to pick another country to live in it’d be one of the Scandinavian countries. They always top the global charts on happiest and healthiest people and that’s almost exclusively due to governments providing very generous social programs. I wouldn’t even have to adjust to the cold weather! The hardest part would be learning how to pronounce things like tjugosju

  • Captain Howdy
    link
    fedilink
    332 years ago

    100% if that country is in northern Europe. Hard nope if it’s in South America.

    I’d buy a ticket tomorrow if there was a job for me in a Scandinavian country and I didn’t need to speak the language immediately.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    52 years ago

    I’ve recently connected with distant family in Norway. I’ve visited Norway 3 times. I would love to relocate to Norway.