I’ll chip in some money for the Bill Clinton statue.
Statue? That’s an animatronic baby!
100% can’t blame him. Monica is a straight dime
regardless, its cheating and he was the president
But… dime tho
good point. i change my mind
Don’t care he was cheating, and the fact he was president is only relevant to explain the imbalance of power. It was immoral because he abused his power; he was a boss who took advantage of his intern.
that too…
Sounds like all he needed to do was make her co-president of the united states of america and they could go at it like rabbits.
I would love a sheep pal!
How do the Mike J. Fox stem cells fit into the dystopian vision?
I want this future, getting old? Clone yourself back to 18…sweet
That’s heavy, doc
No, no getting old, staying young forever instead for me
Like a teen wolf
Conspiracy theories pushed by conservatives who banned stem cell research claimed that people like Michael J Fox and Christopher Reeves drank the stem cells from aborted foetuses to rejuvenate themselves.
Michael did continue to look very young throughout his years!
your use of past tense alarmed me slightly, but he is still very much alive
However the time of looking young has sadly passed 😔
The cop should stop the flag burner!
The sausage will end up full of carcinogens.
Due to health protection laws, the flag is made of natural fibers and paints that are non-carcinogenic
this is the best family circus strip ever made
It’s clearly false. In a leftist world the man and the sheep would take the bus.
no they’d each ride a bike because it’s a walkable city
Walkable city means taking a bike. Got it.
Why the fuck would there still be cops
These are cops that gasps actually help people
he’s retired and that’s his old uniform
Its sad that anybody believes Planned Parenthood was giving abortions on the government dime before the Trump Admin defunded it. It simply is not true.
I’m surprised nobody here thinks porn adverts and fucking in public isn’t bad. Anyone with kids should not want to live somewhere like this cartoon. Other than that and the statue of Clinton getting head it’s fine. The right is wrong to use children as an excuse to get away with bad legislation or to stop the good. To not consider children at all and how the world will effect them is almost worse.
I’m surprised nobody here thinks porn adverts and fucking in public isn’t bad.
I’ll bite, though not in a fully literal sense. Neither of those things is bad, if all involved and in the area are consenting adults. Observers are participants in exhibitionism and participation requires consent. This condition probably breaks the kink for some though, just as it does for those that jump in video chats with their dicks out (non-consent is likely a big part of that act).
However, I don’t consent to adverts that are not directly related to intentional attempts to find a product or service and find them to be a blight on both the Internet and physical world.
You are right.
This is much more of a theoretical argument than a practical one. If it’s a city there will be children.
Children cannot give informed consent to sexual activities, so, that’s accounted for.
What? You said fucking in public is okay as long as everyone consents, if children aren’t capable of consenting, like you said, how is fucking in public okay?
In general, it is not. That’s what I mean. Anyone in the potential “audience” must be capable and willing to give informed consent to participate in a sexual act. If that condition cannot be met, the act is not ok.
ETA: My intent is to apply more generalized ethical reasoning to the situation. Sex in public is not, itself, fundamentally wrong; forcing others to participate in sexual acts without their consent is. This defuses avenues for kink shaming, sex-negativity, and other similar lines of reasoning.
Semantics always annoy me unless I’m the one pointing them out
Haha! Fair!
What exactly is wrong with porn ads like those shown in the image? I’d have no issue if pornhub put up a billboard in my town that just said “Got Porn?”, as long as the billboard itself isn’t featuring explicit images, what’s the harm?
I guess I figured since it was a political cartoon it was implying something worse than what it can actually show but that was probably wrong.
All this going on, and would you look at that, the very traditional looking couple in the middle look perfectly fine. In fact, they look pretty happy about life. As does everyone else. The horror.
Edit: zoomed in a little more. I guess their supposed to be angry? I thought the guy was happy at first. Not sure what exactly they have to be angry about, as literally no one is doing anything to them.
The horror indeed. Everybody seems happy. Although I’m concerned that the sheep can’t give proper consent. But if they’ve mastered cloning, maybe that sheep is more sapient and vocal than I’m assuming a sheep to be. Then a gain the simplest explanation is that consent is just a conservative blondspot. I’m also very concerned that there is a certain lack of diversity here, but that’s probably just another natural blindspot for the conservative artist.
You know what else I don’t see in this picture? No homeless. No cops murdering citizens. No children being shot in school. No unregulated, untaxed, and unsafe drugs being sold on street corners. No surveillance on every corner. Obviously no shame about sex, but again I want to know how that sheep is able to consent.
There is nothing in the picture that would suggest an untoward relationship between the sheep and it’s owner. Please get your mind out of the gutter. /s
I will never use the designated flag burning area. I’m burning my flags wherever the fuck it please me.
i’ll go to the designated flag burning area
…and NOT burn a flag!that’ll show 'em
Seriously, free speech zones are a mockery of the Constitution.
Unless we are in red flag fire weather, you should be able to burn your flag wherever you please. If we’re in red flag weather, I politely request you, I don’t know, paper shredder the flag?
I never got around to it, but I always wanted to lead a protest of “free speech zones” standing pointedly just outside of one.
I love it. I do not, however, understand why cloning is part of it. Did I miss something?
It’s more along the aliens, dimensions, and Alex Jones side of conspiracies. Especially in the Alien side, stuff like clones replacing real people, sometimes for weird alien super soldier stuff, but more often stuff like Biden is actually a clone and real Biden is dead/senile.
Or Alex talking about human-animal hybrids and using clones as a sorta false temptation where they say you’ll live forever, but they just replace you with a clone and/or upload you to the singularity except it isn’t you, they just killed you. Because they hate humanity. Inane grunts and yelling, quality depending on how drunk/under the influence he is.
Maybe stem cells?
Definitely stem cells.
I love the little “bad” things about this: the cop wearing shorts, the electric car, … and people looking happy.
two masc people smooching edit - only just noticed the ladies having a nice time as well! 😃
Michael J Fox stem cells.
Oh no, two same sex couples that are in love and kissing. What a nightmare…
A lot of it already exists too. Like if you want to burn a flag in public you’ll have a designated area your permit would allow. Cops wear shorts sometimes. Gay couples exist. Statues of much worse people exist. So much of it is “I’m afraid of people.”
I just noticed that. Everyone is smiling.
No trash, happy people, everyone minding their own business. That must really piss of the conservatives.
The future is now and it is pimpin’ !!
