YouTube isn’t happy you’re using ad blockers — and it’s doing something about it::undefined

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    152 years ago

    I’d be down to pay YouTube to watch 2k - 4k videos, I’m shocked they allow people to upload videos on that resolution to begin with.

    Now, if they start intentionally blocking adblockers, or have a way to force around them (like Twitch) I’d immediately stop using it (like Twitch)

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    422 years ago

    YouTube, I’ve been using ad-blockers since the advent of pop-up ads in the late 90s. You’ve never been able to stop this, and you aren’t going to now.

    I don’t use the YouTube app or watch your videos on my browser. I use FreeTube on desktop, LibreTube and GrayJay on mobile and FCast on TV so 🖕

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    322 years ago

    What is it with the number of people “happy” to pay for Youtube Premium? Like “why yes, I’m glad I can give a company that spies on me day and night for the privilege!”

  • Chaotic Entropy
    link
    fedilink
    English
    33
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Considering how prevalent scams and actively malicious content posing as ads are across ad services in general, having an ad blocker is just basic online safety at this point.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      132 years ago

      I still see fake download button ads distributed via Google’s own ad infrastructure to this day. I even reported a few that were taken down.

      For all the AI prowess Google likes to brag about, why can’t they make a simple “does this look like a download button?” detector? The scams are not that clever, most of them follow one of a small number of specific patterns.

      • Oha
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Why would they? They would lose money if they did that

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        What’s worse is when corporations try to be funny put a fake download button and the entire ad is like “Wow can’t wait to click this skip button” and they don’t realize that sometimes youtube randomly makes those unskippable so it’s just awkward dead air for 30 seconds.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    19
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Don’t worry, I did something about youtube. That being uninstalled and only go there if I absolutely have to.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    52 years ago

    I do find it a bit funny that their adblock-block is to my knowledge just client side JavaScript. Ya’ know, the kinda stuff adblock is built to cutout.

    Unless they’re going to be splicing up videos to put the ads into the same file (which would be astronomically resource intensive) or only allow YouTube in app and in seriously locked down Web-Environtment-Integrity browsers it’ll be impossible prevent a device from running or not running code as the user see’s fit.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1022 years ago

    The day I can’t get around youtube ads is the day I stop using youtube. I already refuse to use it on my mobile device or my TV, due to the ads.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        262 years ago

        It doesn’t block it, it doesn’t even download them or even request them. There is no concept of ad in NewPipe.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          72 years ago

          Which one? There are 3 newpipe apps in the app store all by different developers, and all “contain ads”

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            252 years ago

            The official newpipe isn’t on the play store because it breaks their terms of service, which makes sense considering 2 of the 3 “newpipes” on there are just completely different apps using the name and logo of newpipe. The third is actually newpipe but with loads of ads added, not sure how long it’ll last before Google nukes it.

            But yeah for newpipe just get the offical ad free and open source version from TeamNewPipe on GitHub or on F-Droid in the main repo. Or if you want newpipe with no ads and also with sponsorblock, you want to get it from polymorphicshade on GitHub or through F-Droid with the Izzyondroid repo.

            • Dizzy Devil Ducky
              link
              fedilink
              English
              52 years ago

              On the subject of newpipe, if you also view a lot of videos on NicoNico, Japanese yt, I recommend the pipepipe fork since it allows you to play both yt videos along with videos from NicoNico without ads. Also works with BiliBili in case you like listening to Chinese vocaloid songs or other Chinese content without ads.

    • smiletolerantly
      link
      fedilink
      English
      27
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      YouTube ReVanced gets you completely adfree, configurably de-shittified Youtube with sponsorblock on your phone. (And Youtube Music ReVanced is premium YT music, for free, of course also without ads.)

      And Smarttube Next does the same thing on Android TVs, FireTV, and probably some others I haven’t used.

    • Hopps
      link
      fedilink
      English
      52 years ago

      On Android the Firefox app allows the use of extensions including all the adblock options you would find on PC. Works great and for YouTube as well.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    52 years ago

    This may be a hot take but I think it’s quite important for YouTube to be profitable because of how difficult running a video platform is already causing there to be no competition. Yeah, I would 100% prefer YouTube without ads (I pay for Premium) and I would love for there to be competition but considering the state of video streaming and how expensive it gets, I’m all for YouTube getting money.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      22 years ago

      I think if it’s not possible to run anymore without ads, then it’s time to shutter YT and let the competition fill in the gaps.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        The problem is that running a video streaming platform is too expensive for there to be competition and YouTube is the only platform with the user base to be able to do it while being profitable. If you want no ads because ads are annoying but you also don’t want to pay for premium, you’re advocating for piracy (which I’m not against either), but if you expect them to keep the servers running even after that, you’re not living in reality

        Just to add one more thing, if your criticism of premium is that they still collect your data after that, fair enough (get newpipe), but if you simply want to use YouTube for free and aren’t that bothered about your privacy (like when you use adblock on a browser) then that’s not consistent with that argument either.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22 years ago

          Which is why peertube exists. Dont run a video streaming platform. Run 10 million streaming platforms all tied together.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            22 years ago

            Yeah, but where’s the user base and content? That’s why YouTube is successful.

            As much as I love to shit on Elon Musk and twitter X, the fact that he’s paying users that generate traffic to his website means that he realizes the importance of user generated content. That’s one good thing I commend him for.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 years ago

          too expensive for there to be competition

          How does that work, exactly? For something like a railroad or a power grid, you get a natural monopoly because you need a system to connect everyone to everyone else for it to really work, and you need to pay to build out the connection to each person.

          For video streaming, you need to pay for servers to transcode, store, and serve the video. Which is expensive, sure. But then each user comes in over the Internet; you aren’t paying to connect directly to their house, and you aren’t putting a CDN node in every town when the town has 5 users who can just talk to the central deployment.

          If you want to run ads, you find some network that places video ads, and you get the ads from them and you run them. Maybe they don’t pay enough and the service is not profitable, but what would make that change if the service were bigger?

          Where are the huge, unassailable costs? Where is the revenue you can’t get unless you are the absolute biggest?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            22 years ago

            The issue is content. Sites like daily motion didn’t have the content to bring in the user base. No users means less incentive to make content means less incentive to make content for it, means less users and so on… that’s the real reason no one’s got competition

  • WuTang
    link
    fedilink
    English
    392 years ago

    we are not happy to endure 4minutes of ads for product we don’t care about, each time we play a video.