There is this common narrative I see all the time, implying that we as individuals are empowered to choose and manifest our own destiny, and this comes up often in privacy discussions.

Don’t like Facebook’s privacy nightmares? Just don’t use Facebook!

Don’t like personalized ads? I remember a popular post on reddit saying “if your ad interrupts my YouTube video, I will hate your product”.

Don’t like Google chrome hegemony? Just use Firefox!

And while I agree that we should strive to do that, the battle doesn’t end here. Facebook has shadow accounts for people who never signed up. Google chrome keeps it’s hegemony despite people on the Internet advocating Firefox day and night. And ads continue to be extremely profitable despite you “hating the product” because it interrupted your YouTube video.

Even worse: even if you “hate the product”, you now already know it. You now know they product exists, and possibly whatever they wanted you to know about it. The reality is that these companies own your eyes. They control what shows up on your screen. And even if you hate it, they control what you end up learning.

the reality is that our individual resistance is very far from enough

I am not saying it is completely futile. It is a step in the right direction. But the only effective solution is organized action. We, alone, cannot achieve much. Unless we organize our resistance against privacy violations, we will continue to live through this privacy nightmare.

  • turnleftist
    link
    fedilink
    82 years ago

    Welcome to the team, comrade. Wait til you find out why they demonize China and it’s approach to the internet

    • /u/stsh
      link
      fedilink
      42 years ago

      This makes china out to be the good guys, but that can’t be right…

    • TriStar
      link
      fedilink
      English
      32 years ago

      Because as we all know Chinese companies never collect people’s data

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    15
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Facebook has shadow accounts for people who never signed up.

    Can someone please explain how they are doing this?

    1. Use Adblocker
    2. Use DNS filter
    3. DoH to prevent MiTM/use your own resolver in Unbound.
    4. I’m still trying to look up how to prevent ISPs from logging my SNI Well, it seems Cloudflare and other domain service providers have implemented ESNI.
    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      322 years ago

      Friends, family, and even people you briefly meet, rat you out. Often without them even knowing by sharing their list of phone contacts.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        42 years ago

        And what happens when you change your phone number? Does that become a new shadow profile? What of they change your name in their contact list? I’m trying to gauge how Facebook handles the inconsistencies of navigating contacts who don’t have Facebook accounts

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          52 years ago

          We can only guess. But they can probably detect contacts for which the phone number is updated or which have several assigned phone numbers.

          • Joël de Bruijn
            link
            fedilink
            22 years ago

            Also all Android / iOS apps with Facebook and Google trackers in them share device info and data easy to correlate, icw sites having FB pixels also.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          42 years ago

          They do more than just the phone number and name. https://www.howtogeek.com/768652/what-are-facebook-shadow-profiles-and-should-you-be-worried/

          It talks about the use of photos, people mentioning you in a post, etc. Sure, facetook publicly said they would be backing off of visual recognition, but how much do you really trust that company to do jack-diddly if there is potential profit? Anyway. If you change your phone number, but the same group of people still have you in a ‘field of contacts,’ their tools can almost certainly fit those puzzle pieces together. Same if you change the phone number. Identifying people is easy if you have metadata.

    • robot_dog_with_gun [they/them]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      52 years ago

      have been on the internet since before you could even pay to have a dialup account.

      It isn’t really that hard.

      you are incredibly out of touch with the average person’s literacy on these matters.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    82 years ago

    I agree with you in all your points and I have also look into why people just give up their privacy so easily , most of the time what I have noticed is that they (we all) love convenience. You want a plug and play camera? Buy ring , Need a plug and play router with a nice App? Buy google and Amazon Eero. Need to promote your business? Where is everyone at? Facebook , Twitter and Google. Most regular people give up their privacy for convenience, they don’t have time dealing with thousands of option on a PF sense router , no time to create VLAns.

    • robot_dog_with_gun [they/them]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      22 years ago

      look into why people just give up their privacy so easily ,

      because we made it easy to use technology and nobody has time to be an expert in every field.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      12 years ago

      What may be needed is to first promote the basic idea that doing the right thing is most often harder than not. It applies to a lot of areas including this one, and it’s a hard one to make a habit of. I figured this out many years ago and yet here I am typing this out on an Android phone, wishing that I had spent that money on a more privacy respecting one when I had the chance. But people have to get into the habit of not always choosing the “quicker, easier, more seductive” route all the time, because we all know where that leads.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    62 years ago

    We are empowered with our own path in life but we do not have full control of it. And that is ok, it is ok to not be able to control everthing.

  • qyron
    link
    fedilink
    82 years ago

    The best way to counter publicity is to simply erase from your mind. Turn it into white noise.

    I don’t have a clue how I’ve learned how to do this but I can have multiple publicity spots thrown at me that I won’t retain a thing. Sometimes to the point I get a song stuck on loop in my head and I can’t figure where I heard it.

    Using tools to dodge or simply eliminate ads is also an option, especially online.

    You can take back your freedom of choice to take part of an audience for publicity if you are willing to put some effort to regain it.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    8
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    This was clearly spelled out - quite by mistake - by one of the very sumbitches stealing our privacy all the way back in 1999:

    https://www.wired.com/1999/01/sun-on-privacy-get-over-it/

    The sumbitches have since learned to work quietly and boil us frogs slowly. But they sure have been busy since 1999.

    When I heard Scott McNealy utter that obscene statement back then, I laughed and I remember telling a coworker “That guy is off his goddamn mind”. A decade later, I understood that he actually let slip something we should have paid a lot more attention to. But it was already much too late.

    • robot_dog_with_gun [they/them]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      82 years ago

      consumer boycotts aint shit. we need tech workers, some of the people with the least class consciousness and poorest ethics, to refuse to create and maintain surveillance tools.

      • infuziSporg [e/em/eir]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 years ago

        when i say “boycott everything”, i mean everything. nothing short of a secessio plebis type of deal

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    52 years ago

    I mirror your concerns but as long as there’s money to be made, the thing that makes money will continue to happen. Advertising is part of that, and if they can harvest our data to target ads, they will.

    We won’t win the fight against money. What we can do is block/avoid advertisements, avoid (as much as possible) services that are known for this behavior, support services that are known to respect privacy, and educate those that are receptive.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    7
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    After reading about Snowden leaks and what world governments are capable of technologically, I’ve come to the same conclusion that privacy is now an illusion. Sure, one browser might send less data to corporations, but the government can see whatever they want on anyone’s computer with an internet connection. The answer is to take a step back technologically. Interact with people in person. Read books at the library. Shop locally instead of online or at big box stores. Buy thrifted DVDs. The further you remove yourself, the more private you will be.

  • alufers
    link
    fedilink
    192 years ago

    I want to add to this: In my country (Poland, but probably many others) you are sometimes almost forced to be tracked by FAANG companies. For example our mObywatel app, which can be uses as driver’s license replacement requires you to download it via Google Play and have Google Services installed. Of course it uses firebase to send notifications.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          22 years ago

          It’s yet another service in the hands of Google and a proprietary library, far too many apps depend on it to send push notifications, which isn’t unexpected when Google, which owns Android, has made it the only standard push service by leveraging their position of power and in turn Unified Push and all its free implementations had to come from the community, but almost no app uses it, because everyone is used to Firebase by this point.
          That’s the open platform aspect, it is also a privacy concern because it means that most apps will have your notifications pass through Google’s servers, I don’t think they can necessarily read the content, but the time of reception and sending and where it comes from is metadata that they certainty see