Pricefield | Lemmy
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Albin Jose to Programmer [email protected]English • 2 years ago

Think about it

suppo.fi

message-square
21
fedilink
34

Think about it

suppo.fi

Albin Jose to Programmer [email protected]English • 2 years ago
message-square
21
fedilink
alert-triangle
You must log in or register to comment.
  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1•2 years ago

    From energon cubes

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    2•2 years ago

    That are almost always built by lower level programing languages

  • DarkenLM
    link
    fedilink
    2•2 years ago

    With themselves!

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    5•2 years ago

    How did they know the first ruler was correct if they didn’t have a ruler to verify it?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    60•2 years ago

    first they had machine code
    then they wrote the assembler in machine code
    then they rewrote the assembler in assembly
    and assembled it with the machine code assembler
    then they wrote the C compiler in assembly
    and assembled it with the assembly assembler
    then they rewrote the C compiler in C
    and compiled it with the assembly C compiler
    then they had the C compiler
    and everything else was written in C

    (note: this is a massive oversimplification and ignores much of the history of programming languages, but it at least gets across the idea of how bootstrapping is done)

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      10•2 years ago

      And then we fucked it all up by writing the JavaScript interpreter.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        1•2 years ago

        Blame the Brave CEO

    • Malgas
      link
      fedilink
      English
      3•2 years ago

      Also the first version of a new compiler (the one written in another language) is often skeletal, implementing only the features necessary to compile the full version (written in its own language), which is then immediately used to recompile itself.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      8•2 years ago

      Indeed. And the machine code is created as part of the physical CPU design.

  • Baut [she/her] auf.
    link
    fedilink
    9•2 years ago

    https://guix.gnu.org/en/blog/2023/the-full-source-bootstrap-building-from-source-all-the-way-down/
    Is a very interesting read on that topic. It’s about how to get to “full” compilers without using already existing “full” compilers.

  • DigitalPaperTrail
    link
    fedilink
    6•
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    it’s gatekeeping all the way down

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    4•2 years ago

    blood, sweat, spit and sometimes a bunch of formal grammar

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    5•2 years ago

    Bootstraps

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    26•2 years ago

    It’s programming languages all the way down.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    78•2 years ago

    This might qualify as humor if you don’t know much at all about programming.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      1•2 years ago

      I used to wonder how the first computers were coded without computers in primary school

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        7•2 years ago

        For anyone else who wonders: by manually wiring in the circuits and flipping switches.

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plugboard#Early_computers

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    20•2 years ago

    Assembly. Each command literally translates to a binary number that the processor will interpret to perform certain functions.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      6•2 years ago

      Or bytecode that the runtime will interpret

  • datendefekt
    link
    fedilink
    19•2 years ago

    You might want to put down that bong.

  • Dandroid
    link
    fedilink
    13•2 years ago

    I mean, it’s not like this is some thought-provoking concept that no one has thought of before. For my SE degree I took 3 classes that focused heavily on the subject. We even wrote an interpreter for our very own programming language in one of them. And that was just part of the standard curriculum.

Programmer [email protected]

[email protected]
Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

  • Posts must be relevant to programming, programmers, or computer science.
  • No NSFW content.
  • Jokes must be in good taste. No hate speech, bigotry, etc.
  • 3 users / day
  • 84 users / week
  • 368 users / month
  • 1.54K users / 6 months
  • 4 subscribers
  • 1.83K Posts
  • 38.7K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • @[email protected]
  • @[email protected]
  • UI: 0.18.4
  • BE: 0.18.2
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org