Looks like its over for me and youtube. Being told I cant watch because of an ad blocker.

Where is everyone moving to and using instead of youtube? I will just move to the same place.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    452 years ago

    Actual unpopular opinion: get yt premium. It gives creators the money they would’ve got for you watching an ad, while giving you an ad free experience, and also includes yt music which might take some adjustments if you’re used to Spotify, but then you will also not be supporting Spotify which is probably the worst streaming service in terms of paying artists.

    (They’re all bad and many people would argue similarly against supporting Google via YouTube, so perhaps it’s a moot point, but that’s part of how I justify my sub to myself anyways.)

    • Subverb
      link
      fedilink
      62 years ago

      Even more unpopular opinion: come to terms with the fact that it’s not unreasonable for even a large company to want to charge a fee for the service that they provide and that I consume for several hours a week.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      102 years ago

      Or you could just become a member of their channel. I look at it this way though. If a youtuber I’m watching has lots of subscribers, one more member in that community probably isn’t going to make a difference. If a youtuber I’m watching doesn’t have the subscriber numbers they deserve, I will become a member. I always choose the highest tiers for them too. And join their patreon and do the same there. If I do that, I will actually listen/watch on patreon then put both YouTube versions in my watch list for when I need background noise and just upvote both videos.

      That way they get all the things I can possibly do for them without giving youtube as much as I give the creators. This is my understanding of how that works though. With premium, if they actually give any of that money to the creators (my heart says no, corporations suck), it would be way less than the channel membership would give them. I don’t actually know how much premium costs though.

      Please do correct me if I’m wrong. At the moment I don’t have very many people on my memberships. And I know most people these days probably can’t afford to do that, but even a $1 or $2 membership to one or a couple of them can make a difference to the ones you really support and who probably need it more than they’d get from premium.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        22 years ago

        Just out of curiosity… how much does that add up to, and if you don’t mind sharing how much all your subscriptions cost you each month in total?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 years ago

          My biggest one is $30 total. That’s also my only patreon currently. I will do more of those soon. I have a list. The youtube memberships probably add up to somewhere around that amount in total. Yes it’s probably way more than premium. I really loved the pay what you want phase of music, but at that time I was broke.

          I am a big believer of supporting talent whenever I can. I am grateful that I have the chance to do so now. My current budget for that stuff is low right now because we are working on moving.

          Thanks to the state of the US, we would have been considered middle class before, but now it’s back to lower. Your dollars don’t stretch very far. I’m lucky to have a husband who feels the same way I do. We will never be rich in money, but we help as much as we can wherever we go. We also make donations to non-profit organizations we know don’t use that money to line their own pockets. So those are the smaller places that always get overlooked. I foster kittens, and we sponsor each one. That means we pay the fees associated with adopting said kitten.

          Apologies for the info dump, but it’s a subject I love. I’ve been dreaming of the day I could do these things since I was in single digits.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      262 years ago

      Lol no. Youtube pays way less then spotify to the artists. Tidal and bandcamp are the only “ok” options.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        7
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        The few cents a creator gets from your youtube premium subscription is way more than they would ever get from you watching ads, so yes, OP is actually right.

        Just because they’re not gonna get a massive cut from your sub doesn’t mean it’s not the most beneficial solution for everyone.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          142 years ago

          Sorry but I deeply disagree. Youtube is not the solution, it’s the problem. Giving money to youtube/google, hoping they will give back a fair share to creators is in absolutly no way “the most beneficial solution for everyone”. Sorry to say but that’s capitalism brainwashing. On bandcamp, you set your own price and get 90℅ of the revenues. Patreon, sponsoring, Tidal are all much more interesting solution. Soon enough, self-hosting will make services like youtube irrelevant, and we will finally get to create fair revenues for creators. Meanwhile, trusting any of the Gafam is just reinforcing their position.

  • topher
    link
    fedilink
    192 years ago

    Libretube. Get v0.19 or higher, youtube just screwed around with its code and broke v0.18. I love how it works with sponsor block to even skip those “this video is brought to you by xyz incorporated, be sure to Yada Yada Yada…” segments.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      12 years ago

      Get v0.19 or higher

      Thanks for that. For some reason I thought it notified on updates automatically like NewPipe does, and I was still on v0.16.1. Oops.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    32 years ago

    I don’t understand why people are just taking it for granted that everyone’s watching youtube.

    I’ve watched maybe a video a month on youtube for the last decade. It’s a noisy loud messy platform and I don’t understand what people enjoy about it.

    I watch Netflix a bit and at least the shows there are actual produced shows and not just some bullshit some teenager made up in their spare time. Even if a lot of them are still trash there’s a much higher signal:noise ratio than on youtube.

    So my solution is: just don’t use youtube? And obviously use an ad blocker or piped.video if you do occasionally visit it.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 years ago

      Many people follow specific channels and only look at content from them, not random bullshit teenager videos that show up in the random/new/trending pages. If you only look at these contents, then yes, you’re going to get those bullshit annoying videos.

      It’s the same with Reddit, Lemmy, and others, people follow the specific channels they want and avoid the trending/random/new stuff.

      For an example, I follow Digital Foundry channel for their detailed analysis/reviews, The SciShow, Sorted Foods, and so on. I click my subscriptions on youtube and it only shows these high quality content for me. Our family spend hours on these contents. They’re not available anywhere else.

  • PatFusty
    link
    fedilink
    38
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    ReVanced for youtube. This links to a Lemmy post of how to install. It also has a FAQ page if interested

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      72 years ago

      Seconded. I’m about 9 months into revanced after vanced got shut down and its virtually identical. 15 min install with easy step by step guides to enjoy the good youtube has to offer without all the shit.

      Also you can add or remove features you like/dislike which is a big benefit.

      • PatFusty
        link
        fedilink
        12 years ago

        I would have no clue. I would imagine if you wanted to do anything like revances on iOS you would need to start with a jailbreak first then maybe a sideload?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    10
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Have you considered paying them? Premium comes with music as well as the extra features in app.

    • @[email protected]
      cake
      OP
      link
      fedilink
      7
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Just googled this also but similar issue to freetube? Just an app to the same service if I understand correctly?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        4
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Not quite - NewPipe is a YouTube client as well. It’s just that it also support PeerTube (a decentralised video hosting solution).

        For YouTube, NewPipe is an anonymous account-free, ad-blocking client. You can import your current YouTube subscriptions using a Google Takeout dump (the NewPipe app gives you instructions) and you can add more channel subs directly in the app.

        The benefits are no YouTube ads, and it’s privacy-friendly but with channel subs - you’re escaping the algorithm. To get the benefit of subs on YouTube directly, you need to login, which means they’re mining your video watching data and using it to target you (and possibly sell that data to others).

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          12 years ago

          For YouTube, NewPipe is an anonymous…

          Not quite. From LibreTube’s GitHub page on their differences:

          With NewPipe, the extraction is done locally on your phone, and all the requests sent towards YouTube/Google are done directly from the network you’re connected to, which doesn’t use a middleman server in between. Therefore, Google can still access information such as the user’s IP address. Aside from that, subscriptions can only be stored locally.

          LibreTube takes this one step further and proxies all requests via Piped (which uses the NewPipeExtractor). This prevents Google servers from accessing your IP address or any other personal data.

          Either way, I use a VPN for both.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            12 years ago

            You’re right - NewPipe isn’t totally anonymous.

            The distinction I was trying to make was that you didn’t have to use a Google/YouTube account. I should’ve made that clearer.

        • @[email protected]
          cake
          OP
          link
          fedilink
          102 years ago

          Yes obviously there is a problem here exactly like the reddit to lemmy problem. Just another obstacle but thats okay. Probably it is solvable.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            8
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            For video hosting? Good luck, that’s almost certainly never going to happen. There is not one single competitor to Youtube even from corporations, there is no way any decentralised solution will work long term, especially not if you are expecting features like 4k or 60fps+ content.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    432 years ago

    Peertube is like early Youtube - people making videos for whoever might happen to be interested, without monetary incentive. Plus a lot of crazy mixed in.
    Now I generally avoid all “free” commercial services that expect you to pay with your data or by watching ads.

    If I want professionally made content, I have to pay real money for it, because making that content costs real money.
    But there’s also still lots of people out there who make content for the fun of it, and it’s equally fun to explore that.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      16
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      I want to like it but… It sucks. :/

      I would love if it didn’t. Lemmy for example does not suck, neither does mastadon. But peertube… It sucks.

      It’s not the fault of the service. It sucks because the content is just not there. So it’s people’s fault for not using it, but of course they don’t, since the users are not there.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      122 years ago

      I checked it out last night. I really wanted to like it, but man, it sucks. There’s currently very little content that I like and it seems to be a lot slower to load and navigate than YouTube. Even when i found something that I liked, the video kept buffering and buffering. It was overall a horrible experience. And i tried a couple instances. They all had those issues.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      42 years ago

      Can’t say there’s no crazy mixed in on PeerTube either lol. And as much as I’d love to like PeerTube… There’s just nothing that brings me back, content wise.

  • 👍Maximum Derek👍
    link
    fedilink
    English
    128
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    ublock origin is still one step ahead of them (at least on firefox) but you may need to go into the extension settings and purge then update all your filter lists. The copy of Invidious I installed on my NAS is even more steps ahead.

    • appel
      link
      fedilink
      232 years ago

      ublock origin is still one step ahead of them (at least on firefox) but you may need to go into the extension settings and purge then update all your filter lists.

      Specific instructions can be found here: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/6089078

    • yukichigai
      link
      fedilink
      42 years ago

      The copy of Invidious I installed on my NAS is even more steps ahead.

      I too have an NAS that runs Docker and have been looking for things to run on it. Container++! :D

      • 👍Maximum Derek👍
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 years ago

        It’s handy. The main downside, since I’m the only person watching videos on the instance, is that my popular tab and subscription tabs are the same videos in a different order. So there’s not much of a chance for discovering new channels.

  • subspaceinterferents
    link
    fedilink
    282 years ago

    I didn’t go anywhere. I spend a lot of time on YouTube and enjoy the service immensely. Also, YouTube Music is my main streaming source. And yeah, I pay for both, every month. It’s worth it to me. YMMV.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      62 years ago

      I started paying for Google music when it started because I didn’t like Spotify. Now I’ve been paying for so long it doesn’t make sense to move away. When they implementet YT premium, I was hooked. I haven’t seen an ad in years.

      Also, streaming music and video is also way more data intensive, I wouldn’t expect the random good Samaritan to pay the server costs for me. Yeah ads suck, but I don’t see it as such a crazy thing to pay for not to have. Two decades ago you’d pay for cable and still get ads.

      I don’t approve of Google blocking adblockers because I’m sure it doesn’t hurt their bottom line that much, but I also don’t blame them.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        92 years ago

        The issue is 10 minutes x 5 ads for a 10 minute video. In what universe is this ok? I was ok with 1short ad at the start of the video but now they also randomly show up. Face it, Google is simply greedy. They know the jig is up and is cashing out as long as possible before it crashes.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          32 years ago

          Google screwed up like a lot of companies do. YouTube was never profitable to run. They were just burning through cash to keep the lights on and become the number one video host online.

          Internally there became a mandate to try and turn it into a profit making machine and the advertisers caught wind so they stepped in with their demands knowing that they were going to be the source of the profits. This is where the content restrictions started to happen as videos needed to become ad friendly.

          I wish YouTube would have figured out another path to help provide the service and pay video creators. At least with Premium you don’t get ads and Sponsor Skip means you don’t see embedded VPN and game sponsors.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      32 years ago

      Lol they downvoted you for using your disposable income how you wished.

      This is still Reddit after all.

        • shootwhatsmyname
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 years ago

          Hopefully most of us understand that. I think for a lot of us it’s privacy/ethical issues with Google

        • @[email protected]
          cake
          OP
          link
          fedilink
          272 years ago

          I run a lemmy server and nobody pays anything to use it. It a public service by me for anyone.

          Just because some company hasnt figured out how to do it doesnt mean something cannot exist for the good of the public run by members of the public.

          Im not interested in conforming to imposed problems personally. Im interested in building resilient systems. That was why we invented technology as humans to begin with. Otherwise whats the point.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            152 years ago

            Video bandwidth is expensive. Plus YouTube pays the creators too for producing the content. I subscribe to YouTube, and haven’t had a real TV subscription in years. Totally still saving money. In terms of hours per dollar per month, it’s gotta be pennies for me. Plus YouTube music and downloading to my phone to save data is kinda nice too.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            142 years ago

            Are you really trying to compare a text/link service with ~10k users to a HD video service with millions of users?

      • Jajcus
        link
        fedilink
        72 years ago

        You say content creators should not be paid for their work? And Google should provide all those servers and bandwidth for free?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      142 years ago

      I’m happy it works for you but unless no tracking/privacy violations is included in their subscription model this will not work for a lot of people here.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        52 years ago

        Same, privacy concerns are huge for me. Also, there’s no way I’m paying $18.99 a month for it, that’s comically expensive. It’s the same as Netflix’s top tier plan, and at least Netflix has the expense of producing their own content to (attempt) to justify that cost.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    22 years ago

    I’m self-hosting a Piped server, and it’s working great. I was able to import my YT subs from a Google Takeout dump, and I continue to add more channel subs on the Piped server. So far, no YouTube ads, plus it uses SponsorBlock, so I can skip that content too.

    For mobile client, LibreTube is working quite well for me. It talks to my Piped instance, so subs (but not watched history, unfortunately) are maintained on the server. I’m still looking for a Piped client for Chromecast GTV to complete the ensemble for me. Right now, I still use my YouTube account with SmartTube Next (which also avoids YT ads and uses SponsorBlock).

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    192 years ago

    I don’t understand this. And not saying it to stir up hate, or troll. This came up for me, I closed the pop-up, and watched the video with no ads. It only added a single click to the whole thing. And they’ve since gone away for me. Don’t know why they stopped, though they have.

    • Whatisawaffle
      link
      fedilink
      31
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      I think the term is A-B testing. When a company wants to see what effect a change will have, they don’t force it on everyone at once, just on a certain number of people (A), and then see what happens compared to the rest (B).

      https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/2e/A-B_testing_example.png

      This is why you’ll always get people saying, “Huh, I haven’t seen that. It’s not doing it for me on [browser].” They’re in the (B) group…for now.

      The data the company wants is to know if, do the test people like the change (or are at least willing to tolerate it)? Or do they spend less time on the site? If so, how much? If the results are within their predictions, they’ll expand the testing until everyone is in (A).

      There can also be A-B-C-D-etc testing, where some people who get the blocking windows would be able to close it, and some wouldn’t. How many of each ended up disabling their adblock?

      This also helps to “boil the frog”, where they can slowly get people used to the idea that this is happening, rather than having a whole wave of surprised outrage at once.

    • HarkMahlberg
      link
      fedilink
      12 years ago

      First, well I’ve been able to get ublock origin to just block the pop-up itself, YouTube now has some scroll event override that locks you to the top of the page. You can’t view the comments or recommended anymore… Not that any value is lost there but still.

      Second, the pop-up triggers a “three strike” system where they won’t let you close the pop-up until you disable ublock. That may be easy enough to defeat today, but if YouTube has already gone to these lengths to force you to watch ads, they may eventually stop loading videos altogether until you do.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      132 years ago

      I believe Google is “testing” it right now, so for some people it’s been slowly escalating to where they were allowed 3 videos before it stopped them from watching anymore videos with the ad blocker enabled.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      22 years ago

      Pop up is with 10 seconds timer here. Ain’t nobody got time for that!

      Piped/invidious/newpipe/freetube it is.