• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    482 years ago

    Yeah, what will he or the Democrats do when Israel does occupy Gaza?

    Continue to provide unequivocal support and money to Israel?

    It’s not like they’ll do anything else like officially recognize Israel has been acting as a apartheid state causing mass human suffering which in turn grew more mass suffering and conflict.

    • Sippy Cup
      link
      fedilink
      162 years ago

      Don’t you dare cross this line!

      Ok don’t cross this line!!

      Ok don’t cross THIS line!

      Ok I’m going inside, if you knock, I’m not coming out.

    • Reality Suit
      link
      fedilink
      32 years ago

      I think it would be the ultimate show of force if the U.S. gives aid to Israel, tells Israel to not go any further, and when they do, the U.S. obliterates their military. “We helped you and you still lost.” I just wish the innocent wouldn’t get killed. The innocent and vulnerable are always the ones who suffer. Fuck war.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      32 years ago

      Obama picked Biden for VP because he was a darling of the Israel lobby, who didn’t particularly like Obama. Anyone who’s satisfied by this sort of lip service from Biden were just looking for any reason to absolve the administration to serve a partisan political alignment.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      32 years ago

      I think there are at least two reasonable positions you could adopt that make more sense. Why don’t you try one on for size?

      First, you could argue that Israel is part of a US proxy war against … I’m not sure who, but someone. In the distant past, it would have been the USSR. Maybe a war against Islam, depending who you’re talking about.

      Second, you could argue that the US military industrial complex is happy for war anywhere, because it’s more money in their pockets, and they’re greedy.

      Of course everything is more complicated, so who knows, but that’s a starting point for a framework that might help you understand the motives of people in power.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    62 years ago

    They’ve been occupying Gaza with their “settlements” for years. What will you do if they continue Mr. President?

    • FlashMobOfOne
      link
      fedilink
      14
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      The last thing the US wants to bring up in discussion is the killing of civilians, I imagine. We killed hundreds of thousands just in Iraq. (And that’s not counting the embargo we had against Saddam that starved a million people and gave rise to Al Qaeda either.)

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        42 years ago

        I think that is exactly what we want to bring up from the US. We fucked up our response to 9/11. We have some perspective on pushing for restraint for Israel reacting to their 9/11. Even if we avoid moralizing on civilian life, we are least can talk about the cost of perpetual war and occupation.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22 years ago

          We have some perspective on pushing for restraint for Israel reacting to their 9/11.

          Is that perspective “go for it, it’s very profitable and a great excuse to do away with civil rights”?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      82 years ago

      Sure if you skew the definition of occupy enough, or can’t distinguish between Gaza and the West Bank, because all you know is propaganda.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        112 years ago

        Israel already controls every aspect of life in Gaza. They ration how much food and water they allow in, to keep them near starvation.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        252 years ago

        Go look at a map of the UN borders. Then look at a map of where Israeli troops are

        Now come back here and say that again with a straight face.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          52 years ago

          Okay I will. Israel pulled out of Gaza to let them have their independence and self govern, they elected a terrorist organization to run the place. Israel has not governed Gaza since then, nor has is occupied the territory. If you want to spread misinformation, at least pick something you know anything about.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              22 years ago

              You can’t even tell the difference between West Bank and Gaza, just grouping them into Palestine. Seriously, go educate yourself before regurgitating propaganda.

          • Zoolander
            link
            fedilink
            English
            42 years ago

            Israel pulled out of Gaza to let them have their independence and self govern, they elected a terrorist organization to run the place. Israel has not governed Gaza since then, nor has is occupied the territory.

            This is only true under a definition that is entirely biased towards Israel. Israel funded the elections in question, which were held over 18 years ago (long enough to where the average Palestinian *wasn’t even born yet much less had the right or ability to vote), and controls all food, water, supplies, utilities, and ingress/egress into the area. That is not “let[ting] them have their independence and self-govern”.

    • Cethin
      link
      fedilink
      English
      222 years ago

      It appears that Israel possibly was aware the attack was going to happen and they allowed it. Regardless, Israel supports Hamas. They need Hamas so they can justify their murder and colonialism. I agree Hamas is bad, but the Zionists have done much more harm. Bibi should not be in office.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        14
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        I would need much, much more solid proof for this conspiracy theory before believing it.

        I don’t doubt Israel had some unspecified warnings, but I just think it’s much more likely that it was a mixture of a misguided belief that Hamas was more interested in political power than large scale terrorism, an assumption that any attack would just be “regular” rocket attacks like we’ve seen in the last years, incompetence of Israeli intelligence services, and an over confidence that the fence and Iron Dome would be enough to stop any attack.

        Also, Israel doesn’t need Hamas. Just look at the West Bank where Hamas isn’t in power.

        Agree though that Bibi shouldn’t be in power.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          4
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          It’s a difficult thing to prove without a whistle blower fairly high up in Israeli intelligence. What does look very suspicious is one of the most advanced intelligence agencies in the world “missed it”, and it took one of the most well funded and constantly present in the area militaries 8 hours to respond.

          Israel has had a major PR problem as more and more people view Palestinians as people who also deserve to be alive. Letting a terrorist group in that region attack undefended is a way for Israel to play the victim as they respond by taking more land homes and lives.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      22 years ago

      You think Hamas won’t be in power unless majority of people supports it? They celebrated when Hamas murder those citizens.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        12 years ago

        That sounds like something a radical apocalyptic christofascist made up and told you on a talk radio show.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        19
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        You think Hamas won’t be in power unless majority of people supports it?

        Trump took power in the US even though the majority didn’t support him.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      72 years ago

      Hamas is palestines means of fighting back at their oppressors. You can’t say they are separate entities, because without Hamas, Palestinians would all be dead by now. Its like saying “I support having meat, but not the killing of animals”. And why are you pro Israel? They want to do genocide. If the Israeli people are innocent of their countries crimes, they will overthrow the government.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        112 years ago

        A bunch of 20 year olds raving in the desert are not “the oppressors.”

        You are just stating your opinion.

        The real fascists are netanyahu and his ilk.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 years ago

        If the Israeli people are innocent of their countries crimes, they will overthrow the government.

        It never, ever works that way. Seriously, name one time when a government was overthrown by its own citizens for committing atrocities against foreigners.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          12 years ago

          I didn’t say it was common, or easy. But that is the bar. Looking the other way on genocide is equivalent to doing it yourself.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            I don’t believe in setting bars people are demonstrably unable to reach. You’re basically asking people to start a civil war to protect strangers they’ll never meet, knowing the outcome of such a war is far from certain. Even if you win, the damage to your country could be catastrophic, and the odds of ending up with new leaders who are at least as bad as the old ones are pretty high.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              12 years ago

              Yes, you should start a civil war to prevent your country doing genocide. Because the alternative is genocide. What exactly is complicated about this?

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                1
                edit-2
                2 years ago

                You’re not listening to what I’m saying.

                Also, why are you on the internet and not out overthrowing a genocidal government right now? Shame on you!

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  12 years ago

                  I am listening to what you’re saying, you’re making excuses for Americans who don’t care enough to stop a genocide happening on their dime.

                  What do you think the most effective way is for an American to try to prevent this genocide? Your whataboutism isn’t wholly wrong, but I don’t know what I’m supposed to do beyond writing to my senators demanding that they kill the funding. So, what is your answer?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        13
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Without Hamas, Palestinians would have their own country lol

        Hamas is literally the only reason they do not. Hamas only exists because Israel was finally close to talking Abbas into a two state solution, which he had previously always denied.

        How do you not know this, at this point?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          12 years ago

          Bro, listen to anything else besides Israeli propaganda. Most of what they say about Hamas is a flat out lie.

    • Zoolander
      link
      fedilink
      English
      52 years ago

      Genuine question… how is killing 1800 people protecting oneself against an attack that killed 1200 people? I would agree that Israel has a right to protect itself from terrorist attacks but I fail to see how killing more people protects anyone. If anything, it’s just instigating the terrorists to continue to try and kill more people.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    72 years ago

    What does he have to gain, politically, by putting Israel on notice in this way? Nothing domestically nor geopolitically. He’s just going to be stuck holding the bag pointlessly when they retake that land.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      32 years ago

      Just to be clear I’m not weighing in on what I think should happen. I’m just saying unheeded commands erode authority (and credibility).

      I’m not qualified to assert an appropriate outcome in all of this, but I think that state actors who punish and pawn civilians domestically and abroad are hellish and should be removed by their people. Everyone on every side of every border deserves comfort and security.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      112 years ago

      Congress is divided because of the Republican party and the invasion of Gaza is surprisingly unpopular. If this gets dragged out the republicans are gonna have another schism on their hands.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    332 years ago

    “I think it’d be a big mistake,” Mr. Biden told “60 Minutes” on CBS in a conversation taped on Thursday and aired on Sunday night. “Look, what happened in Gaza, in my view, is Hamas and the extreme elements of Hamas don’t represent all the Palestinian people. And I think that it would be a mistake for Israel to occupy Gaza again.” But “taking out the extremists” there, he added, “is a necessary requirement.”

    I’m not sure how anyone is taking this as a controversial take. Logistically, practically, and the urgent bloodthirst for revenge make this fucking hard to do. But this seems to me to be a pretty even keeled non polarizing take on a complex situation where there is justification for military action against a terrorist group, and that military action must be measured against the safety and needs of a civilian population.

      • phillaholic
        link
        fedilink
        12 years ago

        Not comparable. Israel is an ally, and needs our funding. Russia has been an advocacy or “enemy of my enemy” type more or less for a hundred years

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        22 years ago

        Because Israel already occupies Gaza and other Palestinian areas.

        Israel withdrew from Gaza in 2005, where the hell are you getting your information?

        • Zoolander
          link
          fedilink
          English
          9
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          Israel still controls all traffic, imports, utilities, and ingress/egress from the area (if it didn’t, they wouldn’t have been able to cut off power, water, and aid). Israel “withdrawing from Gaza” doesn’t really mean much unless Gaza has elected representation and can sustain itself.

            • Zoolander
              link
              fedilink
              English
              12 years ago

              It’s funny because your comment is literally meaningless. Which terrorist organization are you referring to? Hamas or Israel?

                • Zoolander
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  12 years ago

                  False. There are 2. One has killed about 1400 people, the other has killed over 8000 in the last week alone.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    9
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Not gonna happen anyway, Gaza was already under occupation once, it was not a happy time to anybody concerned. The goal is the destruction of Hamas. If Fatah wants Gaza after that that’s their problem and they can have it.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      112 years ago

      I think it was possibly Vice that did a documentary on life in Gaza? This was during peacetime and it was fucking awful.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    612 years ago

    Biden “And definitely don’t occupy 5 different countrys at the same time. Some of them for over 20 years. Come on man!”