• @Uncaged_Jay@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    12 years ago

    I’m sorry, you can go to prison for “using the wrong pronouns”? What dystopian hell hole do we live in?

    • HipPriest
      link
      fedilink
      52 years ago

      Was my exact reaction when I read this this morning before moving on.

      She’s just jealous Glinner’s got a book out and she thinks she needs to raise her TERF game.

  • @Etterra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    132 years ago

    Enjoy jail then I guess. It’s a pretty stupid hill to die on, especially when you’re filthy rich and the conservatives already hate you over the whole witchcraft nonsense. I cannot fathom conservative doublethink.

    • @DerisionConsulting@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      62 years ago

      I don’t see misogynistic posts, maybe they’ve been deleted or are too far down the comment trees?

      Can you give me an example?

            • @DerisionConsulting@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              22 years ago

              I don’t seem to see them.

              Maybe the comments you see are from an instance that lemmy.ca is defederated from, but is still connected to lemmy.world. This would mean that you can see them, but I can’t.

              Can you please give me an example of one of the misogynistic posts?

  • @jet@hackertalks.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    4
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    It’s almost like people are looking for a reason to talk about how much they hate JKR, and in turn promote her.

    The Streisand effect is in full display here.

    Everytime people bring out the three minute hate drum, the righteous come around and sneer, so there is a echo chamber, but there’s always somebody new, somebody who’s never been introduced to the debate before, who now pays attention to this person… And they might end up agreeing with this person.

    So giving all this attention to one person over and over again, is creating them more converts than it’s costing them. It’s just promoting the personality at this point. It’d be more effective to ignore them, and just promote your own viewpoint. There wouldn’t be any controversy, there wouldn’t be free media attention…

    https://www.nytimes.com/2023/02/16/opinion/jk-rowling-transphobia.html

    https://archive.ph/r7njg

    Because she has asserted the right to spaces for biological women only, such as domestic abuse shelters and sex-segregated prisons. Because she has insisted that when it comes to determining a person’s legal gender status, self-declared gender identity is insufficient. Because she has expressed skepticism about phrases like “people who menstruate” in reference to biological women.

    Her take isn’t crazy - it’s not supportive, but not phobic either, and she clearly enjoys the media attention and public debate. She thrives in it… so she wins everytime people give her attention

    • trashcan
      link
      fedilink
      English
      62 years ago

      It’s almost like Rowling is always looking for a reason to talk about how much she hates trans people.

      No matter where you stand on it you have to admit it’s kind of sad with all her wealth and fame this is how she spends her energy

      • @jet@hackertalks.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 years ago

        If we stop talking about her, she stops winning. Maybe she could spend her new found free time to actually write instead of being on social media.

        • @samus12345@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          4
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          Ignoring bigots only encourages more bigotry. She needs to be called out on her bullshit each and every time. Whether or not it has any effect on her isn’t the point - it shows others that such behavior is not acceptable.

  • @doggle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    602 years ago

    Has anyone in any country ever been incarcerated for misgendering a trans person? Is there even a significant number of people who seriously believe that would be an appropriate response?

    Nope.

    Just come out and tell us about your victimhood complex, Joanne.

    • fadingembers
      link
      fedilink
      English
      22 years ago

      In fact it’s the other way around. Plenty of people have been incarcerated and worse for simply being trans

    • @WolfhoundRO@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      172 years ago

      Exactly! It’s like going to jail for having someone presenting themselves as Joanne and you always call them Joanna. How will it ever be so much of a concern to throw someone in jail and destroy their future over it, Joanna? HOW??

      • @UsernameIsTooLon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        42 years ago

        It’s about the influential power. She’s presenting a potentially dangerous rhetoric. She really does have the power to create a new wave of hate if she really wanted to.

  • stevedidWHAT
    link
    fedilink
    English
    42 years ago

    That’s cool, nobodies going to give in to her persecution fetish tho lmao.

    Just stop being an asshole, nobody believe your “on the premise of freedom” arguments, it’s super simple.

    They’re like that kid in grade school who calls the male teacher mrs. such and such and think it’s still hilarious

  • @noodle@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    44
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    [x] Doubt

    Even if you disagree, using a pronoun is just polite. She’d have to go out of her way to do this.

    • Cethin
      link
      fedilink
      English
      5
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      You can’t not use pronouns. It’s about using the correct ones. Why do some people think pronouns are new? “You” is a pronoun, for example. It has nothing to do with gender.

        • Cethin
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 years ago

          Even if you disagree, using a pronoun is just polite.

          It may have just been a typo, but I’m seen far too many people who think pronouns are a modern invention that has to do with gender identity. Sorry if it was just a mistake.

    • @RGB3x3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      He’d have to go out of his way to do this.

      Start misgendering him and see how frustrated he gets.

  • @tony@lemmy.hoyle.me.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    562 years ago

    Does she realize what a complete arsehole that makes her look? She’d rather go to jail than treat people like human beings?

      • @vanquesse@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        132 years ago

        assuming you didn’t make a typo, this ain’t cute. The signal you’re sending is that respecting pronouns is a privilege you reserve for people you agree with.

        • @Chais@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          42 years ago

          It’s more that I’m giving her a taste of her own medicine. She doesn’t extend this basic courtesy to people she disagrees with, so why should anyone give it to her?

          • @vanquesse@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            22 years ago

            Because the signal you’re sending to trans people is that you don’t think respecting our pronouns is a human right.

            She is so vile and toxic in such obvious ways - why not attack her for her wrongs instead?

          • @Honytawk@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            62 years ago

            Because it isn’t just hurting she/her, it is also hurting the people who want to be called a different pronouns.

            So better to keep referring to her cis pronouns every time she/her is mentioned.

      • @casmael@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        82 years ago

        Personally I think pronouns should be abolished altogether - think of the cumulative time you could save by trimming the language like that. Trim the fat. After all, why use many word when few word do trick?

        • doleo
          link
          fedilink
          62 years ago

          Said same thing to friend, earlier. Said to was a stupid idea and need functional words to build meaningful sentences. Don’t agree with.

        • @Honytawk@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          Completely agreed.

          Pronouns stem from a time when it mattered whether or not a sentence was about a man or a woman. Sentences about men were given a higher status.

          Once we accepted women are equal to men, it really doesn’t matter what the gender is of the person the sentence is about. They are human, that should be enough.

          I’ve been replacing all pronouns with they/them for a while, even in my daily life.

    • @iegod@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      42 years ago

      It’s hyperbole and she is referring to being forced to think a particular thing. She’s not wrong on the premise. But no one wants to analyze this because thinking and discord are hard.

      • @Honytawk@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        62 years ago

        She can still think whatever she wants, she just isn’t allowed to call people names they don’t want.

        It is like me calling you “asshole” the whole time, and then proudly announcing that I would rather go to jail than stop calling you asshole.

        • @iegod@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          32 years ago

          She can call people whatever she wants that’s the point. You don’t go to jail for calling me an asshole. Being forced to use speech that counters her actual thoughts is the part she’s willing to go to jail for. You would likely do the same for your own beliefs.