• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    22 years ago

    Sorry for being an absolute tool when it comes to reading these things, but I want to make sure I understand it right. Per capita means per 100k people? So in the case of the US it’s $12k in expenses total, for those 100k people?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    162 years ago

    How was this measured? Is it overall expenditure (including insurance, taxes, etc.) or out-of-pocket expenses?

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      35
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Expenditure on health gives a measure of the final consumption of health goods and services (i.e. current health expenditure). This includes spending by all types of financing arrangements (such as government-based programmes, social insurance and out-of-pocket spending) on medical services and goods, population health and prevention programmes, as well as administration of the health system.

      OECD, Health at a Glance 2021

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        12 years ago

        So if I pay $10k per year for insurance and the insurance company spends $5k on fixing me then the total is $15k?

        If so then doesn’t this paint ls USA in a worse light than it deserves since universally funded countries would only count $5k in this graph.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      42 years ago

      Further, is that number to include government healthcare funding, as well as out-of-pocket expense, in other words, money spent on behalf of the individual?

      I’d like some clarity as this chart on its face is pretty damning.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      122 years ago

      Not to lump it in South Korea, but Koreans stay active and going out for many more years than other countries.

      While the healthcare is good, I’m sure the “not staying at home” is better.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        92 years ago

        And yet this, too, is driven by terrible political decisions that practically force Americans to drive even the shortest distances. As a European, your cities and towns are extremely aggressive towards pedestrians and cyclists.

  • hiddengoat
    link
    fedilink
    1012 years ago

    Take this as a warning, UK.

    Your NHS will get even fucking worse and cost three and a half times as much, and somehow a large portion of you stupid fucks are clamoring for US style private insurance rather than making the fucking Tories do their job.

  • Ben Matthews
    link
    fedilink
    72 years ago

    To separate the effect of demographic differences from the expenditure, might help to divide by an age-weighted population, rather than simply per capita. Also, is this expenditure converted to US$ in MER or PPP (for services the latter makes more sense)?

  • D3FNC [any]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    6
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Cuba’s life expectancy is too high and their expenditure too low to fit on the graph, very funny shit

    Also USA is way higher than 12k a year, what was this from, 20 years ago? Last I saw was like 28k

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    62 years ago

    Thailand on NHSO: Whatever, just take this paracetamol and shut up. NEXT.

    Thailand on Social Security: $25 per month per person forever. Oh, it doesn’t cover mental health or Risperidone or whatever. NEXT.

    Thailand on Govt Officer (NOT Govt Employee) Healthcare: How may I be of assistance today milord?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    352 years ago

    A life expectancy almost as high as China and we only had to spend 13 times the amount of money.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    22 years ago

    So, you’re saying if I’m in a hurry to get out of here, Canada bad, Indonesia good?

    I mean, it is as close to 69 as you’re gonna get without going over.