I got this book because it seemed like a cool edition of The Foundation Trilogy. I later discovered that it glows in the dark when I turned the lights off to go to sleep.

  • stravanasu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    32 years ago

    So smart and inventive! Which publishing house is it?

    • IzzyOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      22 years ago

      I believe they are called “Spectra”.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    142 years ago

    Absolutely expected this to be a weird makeup thread from the title. Don’t Lemmy while tired, kids.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    12 years ago

    I have the whole set of 7 books I’ve been reading through, do people mainly only focus on the first 3?

    • IzzyOP
      link
      fedilink
      32 years ago

      They just happened to be first and then the others were written later. I have the other books as well, but not as a set.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        22 years ago

        I had to take a break around book five. I just finished do androids dream of electric sheep, yesterday I started Neuromancer.

  • Flying Squid
    link
    fedilink
    12 years ago

    I know it’s just the cover because the pages need to be exposed to light first in order to glow, but imagine if the entire book glowed so you could read it at night…

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      7
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      I’ve become a full convert to tablet reading because of this. It’s also nice to be able to slip my book into my pocket and take it anywhere easily.

      Feels like I’m in a sci-fi story every time I use it.

  • FuglyDuck
    link
    fedilink
    52 years ago

    I’m curious? is it the warm glow of atomic energy?

    (or was it ‘the warm glow of radiation’?)

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      12 years ago

      The series believes nuclear is the end all of energy sources, so I would say it’s probably radiation.

      • FuglyDuck
        link
        fedilink
        12 years ago

        That was the context times they were in. Nuclear sciences were new, and miraculous; but they didn’t quite know how dangerous it was to be around, so Asimov envisioned it was safe to have tiny little nuclear reactors powering personal shields around one’s neck

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          12 years ago

          But how do we know that the assumption is not them having perfect nuclear shields? To be fair, besides fusion, our most powerful source of energy is still nuclear. And fusion is not close to being practical yet.

          • FuglyDuck
            link
            fedilink
            22 years ago

            Because of the comments about the “glow” of radiation and such like.

            It’s commonly forgotten that humans can actually see X-rays- before people knew how dangerous it was, it was common for researchers to see it. The glow is literal- In low light with enough intensity, yiu can see a hazzy bluish glow when an X-ray source is on the other side of, say, a wooden door.

            The thing is, at that level of intensity… well it’s very much not good for us

  • DreamButt
    link
    fedilink
    52 years ago

    as someone who has had a really hard time getting into this series. Does it get better?

    • Flying Squid
      link
      fedilink
      22 years ago

      Foundation is basically all concept. If you do want to get into it, there’s a dated but still entertaining (IMO) radio drama version the BBC did in the early 70s. You can hear it here.

      • Alan R Paine
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        @FlyingSquid @tdawg I heard the radio adaptation of the Foundation Trilogy when it first went out but don’t remember being very impressed The 80 episode TV adaption that’s underway sounds hard to swallow. We now have the original 3 books, two sequels, two prequels and 3 authorised books written by other authors since Asimov’s death. To understand these later books you need to know at least something about Asimov’s robot novels.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      22 years ago

      I personally have found them very easy to read. It doesn’t spend time on character development but it summarized the story well and moves on (jumps forward in time) before it gets boring.

      • DreamButt
        link
        fedilink
        32 years ago

        Thankx. That’s kinda what I suspected but also so many people seem to enjoy it. Sounds like it’s not for me

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          32 years ago

          The TV series is quite different, but retains most of the core concepts. It’s much more character-driven, and looks absolutely gorgeous. Highly recommended for anyone who likes sci-fi.

        • chemical_cutthroat
          link
          fedilink
          82 years ago

          Just to give a little bit more to the previous comment. If you go in with the right mentality, you may enjoy it more. The book isn’t character driven, it is a book of ideas. You have to be invested in the “world” and be curious about how things will play out on a very large scale. If you go in looking for a hero and a villain, you won’t really find one. What’s there is a concept and its execution. It’s a long form thought-problem, for better or worse. Personally, I love it, but if you don’t, then you dont.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            32 years ago

            Thanks, this has gone a long way towards encouraging me to open a battered old copy of the Foundation Trilogy I was gifted years ago.

            • DreamButt
              link
              fedilink
              22 years ago

              Yea I might be able to get into it with that in mind too. Thanks y’all

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    22 years ago

    Snagged the audiobook from my library this morning & started it via libby. Audiobook was an excellent idea, thank you!!