• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    47
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Ahhh yes. In capitalism, if you create a machine that can replace say, 10 people, you don’t give them 1/10 of the work. You fire them and maybe hire someone to operate it.

    Machines and human workers can coexist. They don’t have to replace them.

    Edit: Of course they should replace them, but only after we get good living conditions for unemployed people, which are currently non-existent.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      142 years ago

      Yeah, we arent going to get our Jetsons future if we refuse to restructure our society towards not having to work instead of just fighting the tech because its taking our jobs away

      • UlyssesT [he/him]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        42 years ago

        The Jetsons had bullshit jobs for the sake of bullshit jobs. There’s got to be a better way than that.

    • AngrilyEatingMuffins
      link
      fedilink
      102 years ago

      They should replace them. What really needs undoing is this imbecilic idea that only workers deserve to live comfortably.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        22 years ago

        Of course, the end goal (mind the word “end”) is to replace them. However, in this current situation, where many people are struggling to find a job, it’s not good.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        32 years ago

        I wish the bar was at living comfortably. As it stands it feels like the average person doesn’t think non-workers deserve to live :/

      • interolivary
        link
        fedilink
        5
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        They should replace workers and people should deserve to live without being workers, but it should also be painfully obvious that our current economic system won’t support this idea, and won’t until we do some pretty drastic things.

        It’s not that we couldn’t build a post-scarcity society probably even right now given some pretty radical adjustment of resource allocations, we just don’t want to build one – “we” being the 0.01% that have such insane amounts of wealth that they’ve essentially taken over the whole economic system, largely thanks to eg. dumb fucks like Reagan and sociopathic fucks like Thatcher and the people who idolize them buying into the idea that they too can be that rich because the wealth will somehow magically trickle down.

        • AngrilyEatingMuffins
          link
          fedilink
          22 years ago

          That would be the mentality I’m talking about us needing to kill. Regardless, AI will help with this problem, in both it being inevitable that it will provide people with more free time (due to efficiencies or unemployment) - which is needed to be able to effectively revolt - and it will help address the issues of transforming our economic model, as the machines will have a much better way of distributing goods and services. Also capitalism needs workers to have money so that they can buy the products they produce, which should at some point necessitate a universal basic income, which will further help erode the work = money paradigm.

          • interolivary
            link
            fedilink
            1
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            If you think this current brand of capitalism requires plebs to have money, I’m not sure how you explain the fact that when taking inflation into account wages have been either stagnant or actually going down ever since the 70’s / 80’s, the amount of wealth owned by the same plebs compared to the “financial ruling class” (mainly executives and such, and especially the banking sector thanks to deregulation) has shrunk dramatically, and cost of living keeps getting higher, while at the same time the compensation for the “financial ruling class” has grown at a frankly exponential rate.

            Sufficiently advanced AI will, if anything, make it even more likely that that “ruling class” will realize they don’t need quite as many of us around because all we do us suck up their resources and complain how we haven’t eaten anything but cup noodles in a week and our teeth hurt.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      82 years ago

      I was gonna say Netherlands as that’s the kind of shit I expect from Dutch architects, but upon further inspection, Germany?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        9
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Austria, Museum of Modern Art in Vienna. I have no information about the substances or medications the architect has taken.

        Well, meanwhile in Canada…

      • UlyssesT [he/him]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        92 years ago

        Nerd rapture into the loving arms of the godlike but submissive holo waifu and ultimate comeuppance for the unwashed rabble is always, always just around the corner. Just you wait. wojak-nooo

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        132 years ago

        Yep. AutoGen + MemGPT (+Locally hosted models) https://youtu.be/VJ6bK81meu8?si=mGnvMTJsLn_vMvRb

        Basically, a small company of self-refining LLM prompts that output meaningful results + a robust memory management for more long-term back and forths. Instead of “one input, one output. Next”

        Another example: https://youtu.be/5Zj_zstLLP4?si=nHu4vHwidRmvuViY

        I can share more examples and papers if desired.

        On the robotics front, the focus is still on training custom models for given actions. Which is having some success: https://youtu.be/Jy3zjXK4ao4?si=yFdqnl8z9Z8Becsc

        https://youtu.be/WlIYa3lH5UI?si=FQSZAm44h3FuuCoR

        I’m convinced these “hivemind agents” will pass custom model training soon

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          42 years ago

          Wow! I honestly can’t keep up with this stuff anymore… It’s insane how fast it’s advancing.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            42 years ago

            I do it for a living and have given up being up to date on all the new shit going on. Billboard gets the W for now. LLMs cannot build houses in isolation.

            What everyone is missing is that they don’t have to. The right LLM with the right question can output a meaningful “decision” or “judgment call”. That’s all you need. Ask the right series of questions. We’ll call it “thinking”. I really believe that well is pretty deep. Will it be the first version of “AI”? Maybe. Maybe not. But it’s gonna be a big milestone that is going to soon fuck up everything.

            I can’t wait :)

        • TimeSquirrel
          link
          fedilink
          2
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          I’ll be convinced they can fully replace most trade work when they figure out fine motor control and finally build servo or hydraulic systems that don’t act all janky and with slop a mile wide. When they can strip a wire, and then terminate it into a screw terminal, and then install an outlet in the wall. All with one robot, using each tool as needed as finely tuned as a human would do it. And also being able to adapt to different situations on the spot. For instance “shit, the hole for the outlet overlaps a stud, wtf do I do to fix this” type stuff.

          From what I’ve seen even from the best like Boston Dynamics, there are still many decades to go before we have fully capable robotic trade workers.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              62 years ago

              Big lol. Doing unattended trades work is practically the definition of general AI, something we don’t see happening any time soon.

              Build prefab RTMs in a factory? Today, if the desire was there. Design the house around the line and build it like a car.

              Run a new circuit from the basement to an upstairs bedroom, in an old house with weird idiosyncrasies? Not in our lifetimes. The combination of mapping, movement, intuition and the fact that something is guaranteed to go wrong and likely require rethinking the whole job makes this a very hard problem™.

              Believe me if someone can invent a robot that can navigate a lumpy, rat infested crawlspace and install pipe/wires/insulation the apprentices of the world will be eternally grateful

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                32 years ago

                If Tesla has given up on fully self driving cars, wherein driving is a much simpler mechanical activity to replicating the full breadth of human construction tasks, then I don’t see how people are expecting tradecraft to get replaced by Mr. Fixitron anytime soon.

    • UlyssesT [he/him]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      5
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Like so many dystopian stories, the real life version that eventually comes about is more cringe and shitty.

      Compare a decades ago EvilMegaCorp as presented in fiction to the Steve Jobs-emulating ukulele-strumming hellworld corporations burning the planet down around us while trying to seem insincerely quirky about it.

      Ultor in Red Faction was evil and all that, but imagine if Ultor was Le Epic X and all of its maneuvers were narrated by an aging very divorced apartheid dad. my-hero

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    522 years ago

    Lmao they are 3D printing houses right now. We’re all jobless in the future, bud. Thats a good thing.

    • Dangdoggo
      link
      fedilink
      182 years ago

      No they aren’t :/ They can make bricks and ‘print’ walls, which is really just a cool way of pouring concrete. Hardly printing a house.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      212 years ago

      Have you seen a 3D printed house? They look like shit with their lumpy walls, and you still have to run all the plumbing power, and ventilation.

        • Dangdoggo
          link
          fedilink
          17
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          Nobody is saying that but reading a headline that says “Construction company prints some walls!” and then saying “welp that’s it they’re out here just 3D printing whole ass buildings” is pretty uh… Dumb.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            152 years ago

            And the picture says “your skills are irreplaceable.” If you truly believe that basic construction is irreplaceable then I have bad news for you.

            • Dangdoggo
              link
              fedilink
              22 years ago

              I have bad news for you because it seems obvious you have never done basic construction: You’re not replacing builders with computers any time soon.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              1
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              The point is that literally right now houses are not being 3D printed to a good enough standard that we would even think about replacing workers.

              It is also true that technological progress will change that sooner or later.

              I don’t think there’s a disagreement here

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          132 years ago

          Once the elites have everything they need or want provided by AI and machines, we get death.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              52 years ago

              There is a danger. The select few of “us” who are “more equal” will become “them”.

              How do you think slavery sustains itself? A few slaves get to become slave-masters when the old masters die.

              I guess it boils down to the age old questions of what is the value of a human life, and who gets to decide what laws we base upon the answer to the first question.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                22 years ago

                What I meant was that “they” can not just simply erase “us” from existence once we stop providing them enough value, I believe in a revolution of some kind if such practices were to be tried.

                Though I do not believe it would be rational nor beneficial for the elites at the first place, I was just pointing out that there is little chance of that happening.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              22 years ago

              There were more natives in the Americas and Caribbean when the European settlers arrived, too. Only one side had way more advanced military technology and no scruples around genocide and slavery.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            32 years ago

            I can only imagine 50 years from now, when climate crisis is in full swing, there are no more salaried jobs for people without extreme, cutting edge technological specializations or PhDs, and people are doing shit like menial servant work or acting as delivery drivers for 16 hours a day for the ultra wealthy just not to starve, you’ll have some 70 year old zoomer politician that introduces a bill to legalize prostitution in order to open up “new sources of income for struggling Americans” while quietly including a clause that effectively creates death camps for the poor. Conservative Americans will praise the bill on the basis that it’ll get rid of “welfare queens” and create more economic opportunities for the people who don’t get turned into Soylent Green.

            50 years after that, America is littered with the hollowed out ghost towns of long abandoned suburbia. The coasts have been destroyed by flooding from the melted ice caps. Automated workers outnumber Americans 10 to 1. There are around 30 million Americans left in the continental United States. Almost all of them are literal slaves after slavery was re-legalized. Almost everything is owned by a handful of incredibly powerful families. Virtually everyone lives in or around Chicago. Whatever hope people once had for a better future is a long distant dream of a bygone era as the world slowly dies and the people who are left simply persist without ever truly living.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              12 years ago

              Virtually everyone lives in or around Chicago.

              And hilariously, everyone is still paying the Saudis for parking.

    • NaibofTabr
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      42
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Sort of… we can 3D print walls out of specific concrete blends that run nicely through an extended hose system that runs from the mud pump to the print nozzle. But, concrete has a limited time as mud before it starts to harden, so you can only print for so many hours before you have to stop and flush out the pump and hoses before it turns into rock, and the concrete mix can’t be too chunky (like including gravel) to flow through the system.

      Also, if you get all that right, then you can print walls… but not structural frames that would support a multistory building, or plumbing or electrical wiring or insulation or windows or roofs…

      We’re a long way from 3D printing a building wholesale.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    542 years ago

    Just wait until someone connect chatgpt to one of those gigantic 3d printers that print buildings.

    Are we really that far from having “AI” do this?

    • SomeAmateur
      link
      fedilink
      English
      3
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Not so much of the physical building, but I bet the designing isn’t too big of a stretch. Think something like procedural generation to make 2/3 of a floor plan and have humans make sure it makes sense and add details.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 years ago

      Unfortunately, those building 3D printers are mostly just a publicity stunt currently. Too impractical to use at any sort of scale.

      Now, if we were to combine AI with the old Sears kit homes, we might be onto something. Given a standardized list of stuff like room dimensions and the materials required for their construction, AI could probably generate an endless number of variations of both houses and additions for them with an exact list of required construction materials and equipment. Entire series of standardized houses with all the materials prepped ahead of time, ready to just be delivered to a plot of land and constructed on site by a local construction companies, with only minor adjustments required to account for the specific peculiarities of the area. The IKEA of house construction.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      72 years ago

      Still need someone to build it for the computer. What would really help the “AI” is to have something that can handle the creation of different interfaces and modules. Then, it would need to solve or mitigate the maintenance conundrum of repairing itself when it breaks.

    • Flying Squid
      link
      fedilink
      222 years ago

      You can’t 3D print laying all the pipe and the electric cabling and adding fixtures and insulation and all sorts of other things homes need.

      You can 3D print the basic structure. That’s it. You’re saving on bricklaying or carpentry.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        142 years ago

        And the second that it is economically viable the companies will be dumping their bricklayers/carpenters down the drain and replacing them with computer controlled construction methods.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            42 years ago

            There are artisan blacksmiths that probably make bank doing custom jobs like blades and ironwork gates and other such artistry.

        • Flying Squid
          link
          fedilink
          62 years ago

          When will it be economically viable to dump all the people who have to set up the equipment and all of the people who have to do everything but make the basic structure? Is this ‘house set up and entirely built by robots down to the light fixtures with no human intervention’ a near future proposition?

            • Flying Squid
              link
              fedilink
              62 years ago

              I’m stuck in the past because that’s not an economically viable thing to do within the foreseeable future?

              Would I be stuck in the past because I said I don’t think people are going to be commuting by personal jetpack any time soon?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            10
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            When was it economically viable to replace hand-sewn lumber with lumber mills?

            Then they went and made portable electric saws. What a world!

            And then electric drills! And laser levels!

            Remember paper ledgers and abacuses? Ever hear of Microsoft Excel?

            We keep making tools that always increase productivity and reduce time and cost. It’s Constant incremental progress, and on a large scale it’s great because it frees up (human) resources to focus on new industry and technology, which furthers the CIP. On the micro scale, there may be a small number of temporarily displaced workers as jobs shuffle around and workers re-skill.

            But at this particular intersection of technology, we are at a pretty bad spot. We are on the verge of massive progress in multiple industries, and wealth has concentrated in the elite classes. “Temporarily displaced workers” won’t have the capital to re-skill or invest their own resources into new industry. This is bad.

            • Flying Squid
              link
              fedilink
              32 years ago

              When was it economically viable to replace hand-sewn lumber with lumber mills?

              When they did it. Because they could process a huge amount more lumber. I’m not sure I understand.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                42 years ago

                what they are saying is that in the past, technological leaps meant increases in productivity and generally freed the displaced workers into new careers, but this time the sheer scale of change that is imminent doesn’t leave time for that. it’s going to be bad

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        52 years ago

        We have robots that work in warehouses moving stuff precisely all the time. Placing pipes should be no problem.

        • Flying Squid
          link
          fedilink
          62 years ago

          Yes, moving things in a warehouse is exactly the same as laying plumbing and AC ductwork. There’s literally no difference in terms of complications.

          • GreenM
            link
            fedilink
            3
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            Well at one point i lead bunch of those “workers” on real project and oh boy, in some cases, i would much rather have robots do it.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            72 years ago

            You’re right that robots aren’t going to be able to replace plumbers or electricians in traditional building projects.

            But why can’t we change how new buildings are built so the method better suits robots. I’m sure with current technology we could design a building that could be built entirely by robots.

            I don’t think it’ll happen because it will take a lot of time and money to develop such a holistic system, with no return on profit until it’s a complete system.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            52 years ago

            Yes cause technology never gets better than it’s first iteration. There’s literally no progress ever. One and done

            • Flying Squid
              link
              fedilink
              32 years ago

              How soon do you think it will be before technology reaches the point that we can build completely functional houses with just robots? Give me a timeframe.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                22 years ago

                Do you want tonights winning lotto numbers also? How about which team will win the super bowl this year?

                Nobody can tell exact time frames. But the future is happenening old man

                • Flying Squid
                  link
                  fedilink
                  32 years ago

                  So robots will totally take over house building and humans will have nothing to do with it at some indefinite point in the future and that’s why people right now should be worried about their jobs. I see.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    322 years ago

    I know this probably wasn’t op who did this, but I have to ask: who the hell puts a watermark on a meme?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        12
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        I don’t even understand the benefit of it. It’s not like memeing is a job where you have to protect your intellectual property. Why even do it? Do they think so highly of themselves that they need to “protect” memes that they create? They’re randos on the Internet adding captions to images, not V/A professionals…

        It also goes against the longstanding spirit of Internet memes, that they are things to by definition be shared, not intellectual property to be bound.

  • Zyratoxx
    link
    fedilink
    5
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Have you seen the newest South Park special cuz your post made me think of it. ^^